Sports Picks & Predictions
Football Archive | |||||||
Date | Match Up | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Lead Time | Analysis |
09-22-14 | Chicago Bears v. NY Jets -2.5 | Top | 27-19 | Loss | -110 | 27 h 17 m | Show |
I'm playing on the NY JETS. Last week saw the Jets blow a 21-3 lead at Green Bay, losing 31-24, but covering as underdogs. The Bears were outright winners in San Francisco, but their game went the opposite way of the Jets as they fell behind early only to mount a successful comeback. I'm not sold that is all is right with Chicago now. I'll be going with the Jets. Thanks to a +4 turnover margin, the Bears were able to come from behind and beat San Francisco 28-20. Assuming the Jets can take better care of the football than the 49ers did, Chicago still has a lot to prove in my book. This is a team that lost outright in Week 1, at home, to Buffalo. They were down 20-7 going into the fourth quarter last Sunday. So they're one big quarter away from being 0-2 and really they hadn't looked very good at all before that big fourth quarter in San Francisco. Winning back to back primetime games is not easy to do. Especially when you are the road team in both games. That's the situation for Chicago and I'm just not confident in them in this spot given a 2-6 ATS record off a win under Marc Trestman. Overall, the Bears are a bankroll busting 5-12-1 ATS the last two seasons. The Bears' run defense looks no better this year. They've given up an average of 5.3 yards per carry in two games, allowing 320 yards on the ground. The Jets have run the ball very well in their two games, including 212 yards in the win vs. Oakland. They had 146 more last week against the Packers. They also have a mobile QB in Geno Smith. Not only do the Jets have the league's best rushing offense, but they also have the league's best rushing defense. They've allowed an average of just 52.5 yards per game so far. The Jets were 6-2 SU last year off a loss. They had the same record at home. I'll lay a short number in this situation. 10* main event. |
|||||||
09-21-14 | Kansas City Chiefs v. Miami Dolphins -4 | Top | 34-15 | Loss | -110 | 139 h 32 m | Show |
I'm playing on MIAMI. Neither of these teams played well last week. Actually, I take that back. Kansas City played better than expected in covering the spread in a 24-17 loss to the Broncos. But the bottom line is that the Chiefs have opened 0-2, and this has the look of a difficult season for them. I'll lay the points with the Dolphins here. Miami at least has a win to its credit, beating New England in Week 1. That was here at home. They didn't fare nearly as well last week up in Buffalo, but that's a place where they traditionally struggle. Back at home, I'd expect them to bounce back. Both teams may be without their starting running back for this game (check statuses). It is confirmed that Miami will not have Knowshon Moreno available for the next four weeks after he dislocated his elbow against the Bills. Kansas City is still unsure of the status of Jamaal Charles, but remember he wasn't very effective in an opening week loss to Tennessee. Another key injury the Chiefs are dealing with is the ankle of starting safety Eric Berry. Overall, seven Kansas City starters are either injured or suspended right now. I have to wonder how KC will respond after suffering such a tough loss in Denver last week. History says not well as the team is 3-7 ATS off its last 10 straight up losses while also going 1-4 ATS off its last five ATS wins. Miami has done well at home recently, covering five of six. They are also 5-2 ATS in September the last two years. Chiefs QB Alex Smith has not played well and comes into this game as the league's lowest rated passer. If the Dolphins offensive line can protect Ryan Tannehill the same way they did vs. New England, then they should leave with the cash. 10* personal favorite. |
|||||||
09-21-14 | Oakland Raiders +16 v. New England Patriots | Top | 9-16 | Win | 100 | 154 h 21 m | Show |
I'm playing on OAKLAND. Those who find value in taking large underdogs will have that theory put to the test this week as the Raiders visit New England. This line was quickly bet up and it has reached a point where I personally feel the value is on Oakland. Don't get me wrong; the Raiders have struggled. Most would consider them to be the worst team in the league. That's why they're getting so many points. But I am of the opinion that this is simply too many points to lay in an NFL game, especially one taking place so early in the season. There's always the issue of motivation for the favorite. New England is a team that's earned a reputation for putting up a lot of points. But even though they scored 30 last week on Minnesota, I don't believe this Patriots offense is as good as previous editions. They failed to gain even 300 yards against the Vikings and one of their three touchdowns came after a blocked field goal. Tom Brady seems to be in a bit of a decline. He threw for just 149 yards last week after completing only 51.8 percent of his passes in the first game. The Patriots have also hurt themselves. They've had a league-high 263 yards go against them due to penalties. Bad starts have been another issue. They have fallen behind 7-0 in both games thus far. Against Miami, they went three and out, then had a punt blocked. Versus Minnesota, they gave up a seven-play, 80 yard opening drive. With the spread being this high, falling behind at all would make it very difficult to cover. New England has not been a good bet as a double digit fave recently. They are just 6-14 ATS laying 10 or more points dating back to the 2008 season including 1-6 ATS the last seven times. 10* best bet. |
|||||||
09-21-14 | Houston Texans v. NY Giants +2.5 | Top | 17-30 | Win | 100 | 154 h 14 m | Show |
I'm playing the GIANTS. For a second straight week, Houston is a road favorite. They easily covered last week, but that was against Oakland. The Giants come in desperately needing a win, having opened 0-2, both straight up and against the spread. As a home underdog, I think they are a tremendous value in Week 3. Let's not forget the Texans also opened 2-0 last year. They would go on to lose their final 14 games in what was a disastrous season. No one, including me, is saying that will happen again in 2014. But, the level of competition hasn't been too significant to this point either. So far, Houston has beaten both the Redskins and the Raiders, two teams that combined for just seven wins a year ago. The Giants have played a couple of decent teams in Detroit and Arizona. While we all saw them struggle in the first game (Monday night game), they actually played a lot better last week vs. the Cardinals. With the team down 22-14, running back Rashad Jennings had a costly fumble inside the Arizona 20-yard line. That was only after a Ted Ginn punt return for a TD and the Giants fumbling the ensuing kickoff away, setting up a Cardinals' field goal. One positive development for New York against Arizona was the play of QB Eli Manning. After a rough preseason, Manning appeared to have a grasp of the new offense for the first time. He completed 26 of 39 pass attempts for 277 yards and two touchdowns. One of his two interceptions came on a desperation heave at the end of the game. The other was on a tipped ball. Last week's win and cover by the Texans broke an 8-game ATS losing streak when looking to follow up a SU win. Surprisingly, despite two relatively comfortable wins, Houston has been outgained in both games this year. Turnovers, which killed them last year, have swung in their favor and that's a big reason for them being unbeaten right now. But I look for the Giants to get the breaks in this one. 10* best bet. |
|||||||
09-20-14 | Oregon v. Washington State +24 | Top | 38-31 | Win | 100 | 133 h 38 m | Show |
I'm playing on WASHINGTON STATE. One could certainly make the argument that this game matches up the best team and worst team from the Pac 12. But the pointspread is referred to the "great equalizer" for a reason. Taking a generous amount of points at home this week, I like Washington State to cover against #2 Oregon. Though they are just 1-2 SU/ATS, Washington State has yet to be an underdog. So the disappointing start to the season that includes losses to both Rutgers and Nevada actually works in our favor here. It is likely that the Cougars wouldn't be getting nearly this many points had they lost only once and certainly not if they were unbeaten. The Cougars have actually covered four years in a row against the Ducks, every time as a big dog. Last year's game saw them lose 62-38 down in Eugene, but they were taking nearly 40 points. This will be the first time Oregon has played on the road this season. After covering the spread in each of the final eight road games under Chip Kelly, the Ducks fell to 3-2 SU/ATS outside of Eugene last year under Mark Helfrich. This is also the first time that Washington State has played UO in Pullman since 2010. The 2012 "home game" was actually played in Seattle. That 2010 matchup was the closest between the teams in recent memory as the Ducks won by "only" 20 points. As long as Mike Leach is the coach, you know WSU is going to put points on the board. While they certainly may have trouble stopping Oregon on offense, the Cougars should be able to score enough to stay within the generous number. The team averaged 31.0 points per game last season and is up over 36 PPG through three games this year. 10* main event. |
|||||||
09-20-14 | California v. Arizona -12 | Top | 45-49 | Loss | -110 | 132 h 25 m | Show |
I'm playing on ARIZONA. I believe Rich Rodriguez's team will be taking this game seriously as they very nearly lost to Cal last year in Berkeley as a big favorite. But this year's game is at home and this isn't the first time in 2014 that I've backed the Wildcats in Tucson. They came out of the gates with a real easy 58-13 win over UNLV in the opener. Since that time, it's been a pair of close calls for "Rich Rod." I went against his team in Week 2 as they visited UT-San Antonio and won by just a 26-23 margin. I laid off last week's home game vs. Nevada as they won 35-28, but still feel I've got a pretty good pulse on Arizona nonetheless. With the two narrow wins, bettors have lined up early to bet against the Wildcats. I feel that works to our advantage. A Cal team I played in the opening week against Northwestern (a win) is now being overvalued. I say that because the Bears have lost their last 14 Pac 12 games. That's the second longest conference losing streak in the entire country right now. Both teams are pretty good at stopping the run. But when it comes to offense, Arizona is much better. In fact, there are few better nationally on that side of the ball. They come in averaging 582.7 yards per game. That is tops among all Pac 12 teams and 8th overall in the country. The Wildcats may be averaging slightly less points than they were at this time last year, but the yardage is up, both on a per play and per game basis. Freshman QB Anu Soloman has been better than expected as has freshman running back Nick Wilson, who had big shoes to fill after Ka'Deem Carey went to the NFL. I just don't see Cal as being ready to compete with the upper echelon in the conference. 10* personal favorite. |
|||||||
09-20-14 | Texas A&M v. SMU +31.5 | Top | 58-6 | Loss | -110 | 126 h 2 m | Show |
I'm playing on SMU. Sometimes, when taking a look at a given matchup, there's no disputing who the underdog should be. This is one of those instances as Southern Methodist hosts #6 Texas A&M. The Aggies are rightfully big favorites in this spot, but I think too big of favorites against a SMU team that will play desperate football here. I'm going to take the points. To say things haven't gone well for SMU thus far would be a mild understatement. They lost their first two games - against Baylor and North Texas - by a combined 88-6 margin. Then their coach June Jones resigned due to personal reasons. It's hard to imagine any team in the country being in worse shape after only three games than the Mustangs are. But they have had an extra week to prepare and should come out fired up to play this, their first home game of the season, for a new head coach. Tom Mason, who was the defensive coordinator under Jones, is taking over on an interim basis for the remainder of the year. I just think that this is too many points for any team to lay on the road. It would be easy for Texas A&M to look past this game and towards a stretch of four key SEC West battles that follow it. Also, the Aggies will be without one of their key playmakers, Speedy Noil. The aptly named wide receiver has suffered an unspecified injury according to coach Kevin Sumlin. The five-star recruit, who also returns punts and kicks, currently leads the team in all-purpose yardage. The Aggies "only" won by 28 points last week over Rice and that was at home. I can guarantee you that no matter where the line closes, it will be the most points the team has had to lay in any road game during Sumlin's tenure at College Station. 10* best bet. |
|||||||
09-18-14 | Auburn v. Kansas State +9.5 | Top | 20-14 | Win | 100 | 82 h 28 m | Show |
I'm playing on KANSAS STATE. Auburn deserves all the respect that it's getting here from the oddsmakers as they come into Thursday night on a 13-0 ATS run. But that being said, I still feel they're laying too many points against a ranked, non-conference foe that has treated its own backers well when playing at home. I'll be taking the points in this one. Kansas State boasts an 88-53 ATS home record in Bill Snyder's 22 years in Manhattan. That's 62.5%. They may not have covered the spread in the opening game this year, but they were also laying in excess of 40 points against Stephen F. Austin. Laying points on the road in these Thursday night situations is always tough. Take note of the fact Auburn has not played a true road game out of conference in the last two seasons. The have played one non-SEC foe at a neutral site each year. In 2012, they lost their opening game to Clemson in Atlanta and then of course last year fell to Florida State in the BCS Championship Game. Since Snyder came back to the school in 2007, Kansas State has a 27-7 SU home record. Surprisingly, they lost three times at home last year, matching the number of losses from the previous three seasons combined. But all three losses were by 10 points or less. The key for the Wildcats will be stopping the run. Auburn led the nation in rushing yardage last season and again is averaging well over 300 yards per game on the ground this year. But Kansas State has allowed just 174 yards rushing total in two games. 10* main event. |
|||||||
09-15-14 | Philadelphia Eagles +3 v. Indianapolis Colts | Top | 30-27 | Win | 100 | 26 h 52 m | Show |
I'm playing on PHILADELPHIA. With the Colts losing last week, many are going to be pointing towards Andrew Luck's 9-0-1 ATS record off a SU loss the last two years. But I don't necessarily share that same faith in this year's Colts. Especially now that they're laying points to a Philadelphia team that can score in bunches. I'm taking the Eagles. Neither of these teams got off to good starts in Week 1. Indianapolis obviously lost, falling to Denver 32-24. But because they were able to come back from a 24-0 deficit to cover, I think the public is putting too much faith in them. Philadelphia was trailing by a similar margin last week vs. Jacksonville, but still covered a double digit spread against Jacksonville. That's more impresssive to me. I expect Indy to struggle all season defensively. They were already going to be without Robert Mathis for four games (suspended), but now he's lost for the year after injuring himself while working out. Mathis led the NFL in sacks (19.5) last year. That's a big loss. They also allowed 102 yards rushing against the Broncos. Last year, Philadelphia led the NFL in rushing. The Colts have also become too one-dimensional on offense. They can't run the ball and the Trent Richardson trade looks worse with each passing game. Andrew Luck just doesn't have enough help this year. The team will be weaker at linebacker in this game with Jerrell Freeman (33 straight starts) not playing because of a hamstring injury. His replacement, Josh McNary, missed a good deal of training camp. Even with two backups playing last week (will be the same this week), Philadelphia's offensive line didn't allow a sack in the second half against Jacksonville. That's impressive. Though Indy has proven itself to be a great bounce back team, I just don't trust this defense enough to call for them to even win the game. 10* main event. |
|||||||
09-14-14 | St. Louis Rams +7 v. Tampa Bay Buccaneers | Top | 19-17 | Win | 100 | 92 h 57 m | Show |
I'm playing on ST. LOUIS. Both of these teams are off ugly home losses to start the year. Already coming into the game with problems at QB, St. Louis scored only six points in an ugly loss to Minnesota at home that saw them have to call upon third-string QB Austin Davis (remember that Sam Bradford is out for the year). Tampa Bay hardly did any better. They scored only 14 points in a home loss to Carolina. Josh McCown did not look like the same quarterback we saw for a nice stretch last year in Chicago, including tossing a horrible interception right after fumbling the ball on the same play. Because Tampa Bay was expected to improve this year and St. Louis was expected to basically be the same or worse, the public has gotten down early on the Bucs in this game, pushing the line higher than it should be. Tampa might win this one, but I can't see them covering. Not after last week's performance. This is the kind of matchup where I'd probably take the dog regardless. Because the game is in Tampa, it's obviously going to be the Rams catching points. But with a very good front four, I believe they're uniquely suited to stopping a Bucs offense that looked pretty lost last week. When the advanced line for this game was posted at the Westgate (formerly Las Vegas Hilton) prior to the Week 1 kickoffs, it had Tampa Bay laying only 2.5 points. While the Rams certainly didn't perform up to expectations last week, neither did the Buccaneers, so in this instance I feel the line move, especially as significant as it is, is unwarranted. TB was held scoreless for three quarters last week and quite frankly McCown looked horrible. He threw for only 183 yards on 35 attempts, which works out to 5.2 YPA. That's an ugly number. McCown's job this week is made more difficult by the fact that Logan Mankins is out. Acquired in a trade with New England right before the regular season, Mankins was supposed to be the difference maker for a Bucs offensive line that otherwise had plenty of question marks. Even with Chris Long being injured, the Rams' front four remains talented enough (they still have Robert Quinn), to make it long day for the Bucs up front. 10* best bet. |
|||||||
09-14-14 | Jacksonville Jaguars v. Washington Redskins -5.5 | Top | 10-41 | Win | 100 | 137 h 54 m | Show |
I'm playing on WASHINGTON. Is it too early to start talking about a "must win" for 1st year Redskins coach Jay Gruden? Starting 0-2 against the AFC South is I'm sure not the way he envisioned his tenure beginning, so a win over Jacksonville is something I'd certainly call a "must." Washington opened the season by losing 17-6 at Houston (Remember, I took the Texans). While Robert Griffin III and the offense continue to not impress, the one positive takeaway I had for the team was a defense that held Texans stud running back Arian Foster to an average of just 3.8 yards per carry. The Redskins did finish the game with the edge in total yards, 372-316. Jacksonville meanwhile was a painful beat for their backers as an early 17-0 lead turned into a 34-17 loss and those who took them plus the double digits went from feeling they had a potential outright winner on their hands to a losing ticket altogether. I can see how given all the buzz underdogs created in Week 1 (went 11-5 ATS overall) that those same people might want to come back with the Jaguars again this week. But I'd tell those folks to beware. This is still not a very good team and their shortcoming became apparent as they fell apart down the stretch last week. The offense didn't really do anything after taking that 17-0 lead. Toby Gerhart was given a pretty sweet deal to be the lead running back here, but gaining only 42 yards on 18 carries is not a positive sign. Chad Henne is still the quarterback, by the way. Defensively, this team lacks a serious pass rush. That's got to be music to the ears of RG3 after facing Houston last week. At the end of the day, Gruden can't lose his 1st home game or he risks losing the fanbase. Look for Washington to win this one by at least a touchdown. 10* personal favorite. |
|||||||
09-13-14 | Northen Illinois v. UNLV +9 | Top | 48-34 | Loss | -110 | 130 h 19 m | Show |
I'm playing on UNLV. It's been a pretty rough start to the season so far for these Rebels. I went against them in their first game as they lost a laugher at Arizona, 58-13 as big underdogs. Last week, though a win, was hardly any more impressive as they beat a lowly FCS squad, Northern Colorado, by only a 13-12 final margin. Though that kind of win isn't going to impress anyone, it should be mentioned that UNLV did turn the ball over four times, obviously making it harder on themselves. One positive is that they did run the ball for 211 yards. They are back to catching a big number this week as they host Northern Illinois, who is off a win over Northwestern, which was one of just a series of black eyes for the Big 10 last week. But despite beating a team from the Big 10 for a second straight year, I don't believe there's reason to think that this Huskies team will be as strong as the last couple of seasons. Sure NIU has won 16 consecutive road games. But they were held scoreless in the first half last week by a Northwestern defense that likely isn't very good. This is also the second of what will be three straight road games for the team. This is the sandwich game as they'll play Arkansas next week, again a foe from a bigger conference. I can see them looking past UNLV here. Last year when Northern Illinois was better and had Jordan Lynch at quarterback, they went out West once during the regular season and failed to cover an even larger number against a poor Idaho team. Ironically, they had just beaten Iowa the game previous, so it's a similar letdown situation this week. NIU was actually 0-2 ATS on the West Coast last year, also losing its bowl game to Utah State by a score of 21-14. 10* best bet. |
|||||||
09-13-14 | Georgia v. South Carolina +6 | Top | 35-38 | Win | 104 | 130 h 31 m | Show |
I'm playing on SOUTH CAROLINA. Who would have guessed that this would be the line for this all-important SEC East matchup just two weeks ago? But with the Gamecocks off to a lethargic start that includes that high-profile, embarrassing loss to Texas A&M in the opener and then a close call last week vs. East Carolina, they are now a decided underdog against Georgia. The Bulldogs have played just one game and looked impressive against Clemson. I was on Georgia there, laying the points. Though it ended up being a relatively easy cover, it was a three-point game going into the fourth quarter. They will not have the benefit of playing in Athens in this game. Last year it was Georgia that came into this matchup in somewhat of dire straits, off a LOSS to Clemson the week prior. Now that they are off a win AND a bye week, it's kind of easy to see why they'd be favored, especially with South Carolina struggling. But I think it's too many points. Before the season started, South Carolina absolutely would have been favored here. Remember that South Carolina came into the season owning the nation's longest home win streak at 18 games. A&M caught them off guard. I don't think Georgia will. Georgia had lost to South Carolina three straight times before winning last year. They have not won in Columbia since '08, scoring a total of only 13 points in two losses since. The Gamecocks' defense has taken it on the chin in the first two games, but the pass-happy attacks of A&M and East Carolina may very well have simply been bad matchups for their secondary. Georgia is a run-first team that I see them matching up better against. Speaking of running the ball, South Carolina will have to get Mike Davis going. He has just 116 yards rushing in the first two games. He went for 149 last year against Georgia. He was not healthy in the A&M game and the team falling behind early didn't help his production. Last week, he did run for 101 yards against East Carolina. This week, I'll call for a big game from him and South Carolina. 10* SEC best of the best. |
|||||||
09-13-14 | Illinois v. Washington -14.5 | Top | 19-44 | Win | 100 | 128 h 1 m | Show |
I'm playing on WASHINGTON. Chris Petersen is perhaps finding out that life in the Pac 12 isn't all that it's cracked up to be. His Huskies have struggled to a 2-0 start, beating Hawaii and Eastern Washington by a combined 8 points. But I'll give them a bit of a pass as playing out on the Island can be tough as can the week after. If there's one conference you want to be playing right now, it's the Big 10. The once proud league got beat up badly last week with a number of high profile losses. Who would have guessed that Illinois would be among the few left at 2-0? But the Illini have certainly had a couple of close calls. In Week 1, they actually trailed Youngstown State (a FCS team) 9-7 entering the fourth quarter. Last week saw them neck and neck with Western Kentucky, again trailing at home as favorites entering the final 15 minutes. Oddsmakers are predicting another easy win for the Pac 12 over the Big 10 this week. This is hardly Oregon-Michigan State in terms of overall levels of talent, but might the discrepancy between the two teams be the same? Washington beat Illinois last year by 10 points in Chicago, a game they never trailed. Though it got close in the end, the Huskies led by as many as three touchdowns. They also rolled up 600-plus yards total offense, nearly double that of the Illini. Taking their act on the road this year is probably not going to end well for Illinois. They have lost eight of nine away games the last two years for coach Tim Beckman. They are also 1-8 against the spread. The last time they traveled West was two years ago against Arizona State and predictably they lost badly 45-14 (as only 4-point dogs?) Meanwhile, Washington has a pretty safe bet in Seattle, going 15-6 ATS its last 21. 10* personal favorite. |
|||||||
09-13-14 | Iowa State v. Iowa -12.5 | Top | 20-17 | Loss | -100 | 127 h 14 m | Show |
I'm playing on IOWA. On a Saturday that saw the Big 10 pretty much embarrass itself nationally, Iowa came awfully close to putting itself at the top of the list. They trailed Ball State with a minute to go, at home, before scoring a touchdown to go ahead for good 17-13. After not being that impressive either in the first game against Northern Iowa, there's some real "soul searching" going on right now in Iowa City leading up to the big in-state rivalry game with Iowa State. Fortunately for the Hawkeyes, ISU is more down than they are. The Cyclones opened their season by getting blown out by North Dakota State, the second year in a row the Bison opened their season with a win over a Big 12 opponent. Then last week saw ISU come close, but ultimately fall short against Kansas State in a 32-28 loss. Though Iowa State left town with the cash last week and the last four matchups with Iowa have all been decided by six points or less, I'm still going to lay the points with the favorite this year. Iowa should be better while little was expected from the contingent from Ames. Iowa's goal this season is a Big 10 championship and with a favorable schedule and the conference being down, they should be a player. Their four top players on offense all returned. After throwing 2 or more touchdown passes in seven games last year, QB Rudock had a career-high in yards last week with 322. This offensive line, thought to be one of the best in the Big 10, should be better. I'll point out that the Hawkeyes missed three field goals last week against Ball State. That was part of the reason that the game was close despite Iowa having a 27-13 edge in first downs and a 455-219 edge in yards. The defense did not allow a touchdown in the game as the only time Ball State found the end zone came on an early fumble return. 10* best of the best. |
|||||||
09-11-14 | Pittsburgh Steelers v. Baltimore Ravens -2.5 | Top | 6-26 | Win | 100 | 72 h 19 m | Show |
I'm playing on BALTIMORE. Obviously, this game is going to take a back seat to the Ray Rice storyline. But I feel in a must-win spot, the Ravens are somewhat being undervalued here. They nearly came back to beat Cincinnati last week while Pittsburgh almost blew it against Cleveland. I can't see Baltimore, traditionally a very strong home team, opening its season with two straight division losses at M&T Bank Stadium. There were some trends last week that really supported a play on the Ravens. Before losing outright to the Bengals to open the season, the team was 9-0 straight up and 8-1 against the spread as a home favorite of three points or less under John Harbaugh. Week 1 marked their first home loss in the first four weeks of the season since Harbaugh's been the coach here. Just last year, they were 6-2 SU at home. The fact that they lost last week doesn't make those trends any less true; there's just a loss in there now. Incredibly, the past five meetings between these teams have all been decided by three points or less. That makes a case for the dog in this situation, especially since the Ravens only won 22-20 over the Steelers Thanksgiving night at home last year. (PIttsburgh left with the cash as three-point underdogs after missing a potential game-tying 2-pt conversion.) But the Steelers were also on the verge of not covering that game obviously, before the late TD. They were on the wrong end of a backdoor cover last week, blowing a 27-3 lead at home to the Browns and needing a last second field goal just to pull out the straight up win. With the Ray Rice situation hopefully behind them, perhaps Baltimore pulls together in this one? It's a game they have to have and in the past we've seen teams pull together amidst similar distractions. Perhaps Joe Flacco's numbers would have looked a lot better last week had his receivers not dropped six passes. Also, the Ravens defense did allow just one touchdown, the late bomb to AJ Green. Pittsburgh's defense looked a lot worse against a Cleveland offense that few have an affinity for. 10* main event. |
|||||||
09-08-14 | San Diego Chargers +3.5 v. Arizona Cardinals | Top | 17-18 | Win | 100 | 182 h 44 m | Show |
I'm playing on SAN DIEGO. Getting the "hook" (half point) here is obviously pretty nice. But I wouldn't be surprised if we didn't end up needing it at all as I think the Chargers have an excellent shot at taking this game outright. Arizona is coming off a 10-win season. But few are predicting a repeat finish this season playing in the tough NFC West. The Cardinals defense carried them last year, but three of their starting players from the front seven are gone (Dansby, Dockett, Washington). That's going to spell trouble against a Chargers offense that by most measures only ranked behind Denver in terms of being the best in the league in 2013. San Diego's defense was its Achilles heel last year, but that group actually improved as the season went along, thanks to a pass rush. They brought in some new cornerbacks in the offseason, one in the draft (Verrett) and one in free agency (Flowers), and I like those moves. But when discussing the Chargers, you have to talk QB Philip Rivers. He completed almost 70% of his passes last season, a number which the coaching staff predicted before the season and was laughed at for. The new coaching staff did wonders for him and he ended up with almost 4500 yards passing and 32 touchdown passes. Even if tight end Antonio Gates can't go tonight, Rivers won't be lacking for weapons. Receiver Keenan Allen had great rookie year and the Chargers have another TE in waiting in LaDarius Green. I am far more worried about Arizona's injury situation. Running back Andre Ellington was supposed to have a breakout year, but has been limited in practice and will be a gametime decision. Also, what if punter Dave Zastudil can't go? The team doesn't have another punter on the roster! The Cardinals are 0-4 ATS their last four appearances on Monday Night Football. 10* best bet. |
|||||||
09-07-14 | Washington Redskins v. Houston Texans -2.5 | Top | 6-17 | Win | 100 | 148 h 27 m | Show |
I'm playing on HOUSTON. Two teams looking to rebound from very disappointing campaigns meet in the first week of the season. With Houston at home and available below the key number of three, I've decided to lay the points. In fact, according to record these teams should have drafted 1-2 back in April. But because of the Robert Griffin III trade, the Redskins lost their right to the #2 overall choice. Houston being able to add Jadeveon Clowney while Washington really added no one of consequence is an obvious and automatic advantage in the Texans favor. We have two rookie head coaches making their debuts in this one as well. Both have been head coaches before; Houston's Bill O'Brien in college and Washington's Jay Gruden in the Arena League. Both were also offensive coordinators previously in the NFL. Opening at home, I give the slight edge to O'Brien. With Clowney joining JJ Watt, I give the Texans a significant edge defensively in this matchup. Linebacker Brian Cushing also returns from an injury-riddled campaign. While Houston has questions at quarterback (Ryan Fitzpatrick?), who knows if RG3 will ever be able to stay healthy for Washington? After the disastrous end to the Mike Shanahan era in D.C, things can probably only get better, but Griffin is back to square one. Trends aren't necessarily as useful when you have new head coaches. But for what it's worth, the Redskins did fail to cover five of their last six road games last year. There is the fact that Houston lost its last 14 games last season. So O'Brien and the new coaching staff will be desperate for a win. They'll get it and the cover. 10* personal favorite. |
|||||||
09-06-14 | BYU v. Texas -3.5 | Top | 41-7 | Loss | -106 | 142 h 32 m | Show |
I'm playing on TEXAS. I'm well aware that Longhorns QB David Ash is going to miss this game. But by now the team should be used to playing without him. Also, with the way the defense played for Charlie Strong in the opener, the impact of Ash's absence won't be as great. I know it was "only" North Texas, but the Mean Green have a veteran offensive line and it was dominated by the Texas front four. They forced two interceptions on the first seven pass attempts they faced and brought constant pressure throughout the game. They allowed only eight first downs and 94 total yards! That's what you call a dominating performance. Remember that Strong's defenses at Louisville were very good. Just last year he presided over a unit that ranked #1 against the run in the entire country. That will come in handy facing a BYU offense that averaged 5.5 yards per carry in last week's 35-10 win over Connecticut. Lest we forget the revenge angle that's in play. The Longhorns got embarrassed last year out in Provo, losing 40-21. They actually came into that game as seven-point favorites. That loss signaled the end of the Mack Brown era. As noted above, the defense BYU will run into here is going to be much tougher. Ash played last year against BYU and obviously wasn't much a difference maker. As I said before, they are used to being without him as he was lost for the year in game #3 (week after BYU) last season. The 'Horns responded by winning seven of their final nine regular season games. Look for the defense to carry Texas to victory in this game as we're getting good value and Ash won't be missed as much as you think. 10* revenge GOM |
|||||||
09-06-14 | East Carolina v. South Carolina -13.5 | Top | 23-33 | Loss | -118 | 141 h 3 m | Show |
I'm playing on SOUTH CAROLINA. Obviously, you couldn't have drawn up a worse start for Steve Spurrier and South Carolina as they got hammered by Texas A&M in their opening game, 52-28, at home. They obviously weren't ready for A&M quarterback Kenny Hill. None of us were. This week's opponent fortunately won't be nearly as challenging and this looks like a bounce back spot for the Old Ball Coach and his team. The opponent is East Carolina, a team that just two years ago the Gamecocks clobbered on this field by a score of 48-10. They easily covered the three touchdown spread in that one. The line for this matchup isn't nearly as high because of what happened last week. Unfortunately, some of the value is now gone because the number has been bet up, but that's still okay. I expect South Carolina to roll in this one. East Carolina is a team that like Texas A&M will look look to pass the ball quite a bit. Last week, it really didn't matter what the Pirates' offensive gameplan was because they were obviously going to defeat NC Central and they did by a score of 52-7. But I wouldn't count on Spurrier's defense being as bad as it was last Thursday. What I would count on is South Carolina bouncing back. Only once in the previous three seasons have they lost back to back games. That was in 2012 when they played at LSU and Florida in consecutive weeks. Don't forget that coming into the year, this was the team with nation's longest home winning streak. Laying two scores seems like a lot if you watched the Gamecocks last week, but considering the mood the coaching staff is likely to be in, plus how we all viewed this team before the A&M game, they're certainly up to the challenge. 10* personal favorite. |
|||||||
09-06-14 | Georgia Tech v. Tulane +10.5 | Top | 38-21 | Loss | -102 | 138 h 1 m | Show |
I'm playing on TULANE. Going against Tulane provided me with my first win of this college football season. I have to say that it was a fortunate one though. Playing at Tulsa and getting anywhere from 3.5 (where line opened) to 6.5 (where it closed), the Green Wave came out and took a 21-7 lead on the road. At that point, I was sweating pretty badly. But not only did Tulsa come back and win, but they prevailed by seven points in double overtime! A real bad beat if you were a Tulane bettor though. This week sees the Green Wave taking double digits at home against Georgia Tech. The Yellow Jackets opened their season with a fairly uninspired 38-19 win over Wofford. That was at home too. Not sure if I'd want to be caught laying double digits on the road with this relatively inexperienced GT team this early in the season, so I'll go the other way. The Yellow Jackets were a double digit road favorite only once all of last season. They pushed at Virginia, winning 35-25. They went 0-3-1 ATS their final four road games in 2013. They are also 0-4-1 ATS their last five games following a SU win, showing that they can't maintain success typically. Since Paul Johnson's first two seasons when they went 5-0 ATS as road chalk, the Jackets are just 6-8-2 ATS in that role. Tulane is both 5-0 ATS off an ATS loss and 4-0 ATS its last four home games. The Tulsa team they played last week figures to be improved this year. I can't say the same about Georgia Tech. The Green Wave had over 500 yards of total offense last week. I like seeing that. They've also had two additional days to prepare for this game. 10* best bet. |
|||||||
09-01-14 | Miami (Fla) v. Louisville -3 | Top | 13-31 | Win | 100 | 23 h 54 m | Show |
I'm playing on LOUISVILLE. These teams just met in the Russell Athletic Bowl at the end of last season. Louisville dominated in a 36-9 rout. Though they won't have Teddy Bridgewater (NFL) or DeVante Parker (injured) for the 2014 opener, they do have Bobby Petrino back on the sidelines and as a result I don't expect the Cardinals to skip a beat. Look for them to win big in their first ever ACC home game. Miami will be starting a true freshman at quarterback themselves, so both teams are dealing with new starters at the position. At least Will Gardner has some previous experience for Louisville. Petrino won 41 games in his four-year previous stint at Louisville. Since then, his career has been marred in controversy. He famously quit the Atlanta Falcons to become the coach at Arkansas, but then was caught with a female student after he crashed his motorcycle. He resurfaced at Western Kentucky last year where he went 8-4 straight up. Obviously, he's still a very good coach. Every year we hear how Miami "is back." Every year this never really takes place. Last year's team lost four games. This year's returns fewer starters and plays a tougher schedule. This is a tough spot having to open their season on the road with Brad Kaaya making his first career start. Miami's top offensive weapon is running back Duke Johnson, who is coming back from a serious ankle injury that cost him the second half of last season. Louisville shockingly led the nation in rushing yards allowed last season. With this being a national TV game at home, Petrino and the new coaching staff are absolutely going to place a massive emphasis on winning here. They will with room to spare. 10* main event. |
|||||||
08-31-14 | Utah State +6.5 v. Tennessee | Top | 7-38 | Loss | -106 | 190 h 29 m | Show |
I'm playing on UTAH STATE. Tennessee owns the unique distinction of being the ONLY team in the country not to return a single starter along either the offensive or defensive line. This is a dangerous Utah State team they are laying points to and I think it's too many. When looking at Utah State this year, QB Chuckie Keeton is the name to remember. Considered to be one of the more irreplaceable players in all of CFB, Keeton was lost for the year at the midpoint of last season. The Aggies still made the Mountain West Championship Game and there gave Fresno State all they could handle. Keeton is back this year. Something you may not know is that at the time of the ACL injury he was second in the entire country in TD passes with 18. He makes Utah State infinitely better. The Aggies won't be intimidated by the environment of Neyland Stadium either. Three years ago with Keeton making his first career start they went into Auburn and nearly won as 23-point underdogs. That Auburn team was coming off a National Championship. This Tennessee team certainly is not. Utah State also brings in a quality defense. Last year saw them rank 2nd in the country, giving up just 2.8 yards per rush. It's pretty incredible to see how far Tennessee has fallen down the SEC pecking order. They've had four consecutive losing seasons. It's going to be tough avoiding a fifth as they face one of the nation's most difficult schedules. The SEC vs. the Mountain West is what's helped to inflate this line. But Tennessee is one of the SEC's worst teams and Utah State is one of the MWC's best. Take the points in this one. 10* GOM |
|||||||
08-30-14 | Ohio +3 v. Kent State | Top | 17-14 | Win | 100 | 166 h 31 m | Show |
I'm playing on OHIO. Let's get right into the revenge angle, shall we? Ohio was Kent's final opponent last year. This is a game Ohio has been waiting for all offseason as they were hammered 44-18 at home by a Kent team that finished only 4-8. That's one of those head scratchers when you look back at the previous season's results. I expect the Bobcats to gain a measure of revenge coming out of the gate. Last year's game saw Ohio fall into a huge hole early as Kent State scored two defensive touchdowns in the opening nine minutes. It was pretty much over from there. You'd have to believe that something similar won't happen again. This is actually a double revenge situation for Ohio as they lost here 28-6 in 2012. But that was a ranked Golden Flashes team that was the program's best since the 70's. This KSU team loses perhaps its best players on both sides of the ball from last season, RB Dri Archer and DT Roosevelt Nix. Ohio also loses a ton of talent, especially on offense, but does have eight starters back on defense. They were the better team overall last year and should be again this year. Taking the points in this MAC East rivalry has traditionally been the way to go. The underdog has taken the game outright in half of the past six matchups. Usually that has been Kent State getting points. That's not the case this year, however. I can't see the Bobcats failing to cover a 6th straight time against their division rivals. Kent was 0-4-1 ATS at home last year. 10* revenge game of the month. |
|||||||
08-30-14 | Clemson v. Georgia -7.5 | Top | 21-45 | Win | 100 | 10 h 34 m | Show |
I'm playing on GEORGIA. Two big things have me pointing towards Georgia in this matchup. One is revenge. Two is they should be much improved while Clemson is likely to go in the other direction. I'm not concerned about laying the points either as the Bulldogs have lost only one game "between the Hedges" the last two years. Georgia is off an 8-5 season where many things went wrong, namely an injury to starting quarterback Aaron Murray. Hutson Mason had to step in as his replacement and he certainly performed admirably. He led the team from 20 points back to defeat Georgia Tech in the final regular season game and then threw for 320 yards against Nebraska in the bowl game. Those performances bode well for this season. There were also a number of close losses for Georgia last season, most notably the one against Auburn with the ridiculous deflection on the Hail Mary. They also lost by four at Vanderbilt and by three at Clemson. This will be an improved team this year. That three-point loss to Clemson could have gone either way. The Bulldogs actually had the edge in total yards and did lead for most of the second quarter. Getting the rematch at home is a big deal, especially in a season opener. Clemson loses a number of its top players at the skill positions, most notably WR Sammy Watkins. But also gone is their all-time leading passer Tajh Boyd, who had 5 touchdowns and 312 total yards in last year's game. I'm not sure how the Tigers will replace that. Don't be surprised if Georgia RB Todd Gurley is the difference in this one. Last year, he ran for 154 yards against Clemson - on only 12 carries. He is perhaps the best running back in the entire country. 10* personal favorite. |
|||||||
08-30-14 | California +11 v. Northwestern | Top | 31-24 | Win | 100 | 163 h 4 m | Show |
I'm playing on CALIFORNIA. This line has been bouncing around since it opened. Many other bettors quickly joined me on the dog as Cal went from +12 to +10. There's since been some buyback on the chalk. Getting double digits, I feel the value is on California. This is a cross-country trip for the Bears, who hosted Northwestern in the 2013 opener and lost 44-30. That set the tone for a terrible first season under Sonny Dykes where they went 1-11 with no wins over FBS teams. But I think there's reasons to be a little more optimistic with this year's Cal team. They bring 15 starters back, nine of them on offense. As a freshman, QB Jared Goff set the passing record (for freshman) at the university. It's also unlikely that the team will finish -15 in turnover margin again as they did last season. Basically, what I'm saying is Cal can only go up. Northwestern is also coming off a terribly disappointing season. They were more competitive than California was, but no team (perhaps in the nation) had worse luck at the end of games. They too are almost guaranteed of improving on 2013's win total. But I'm still not sure I like the Wildcats in the chalk role. They failed to cover four of five times last season laying points in Evanston. Last year's game was a bit closer than the final score indicates. It was tied early in the 4th quarter and Cal was able to cut the lead to 7 points with just under five minutes to go. They also had to overcome two interceptions that were returned for touchdowns. That's basically a guaranteed loss right there and ended up being the difference in the final score. Northwestern is a team not known for winning games by big margins. I prefer to be on them as a dog, quite honestly. There is also the issue of RB Venric Mark, who was to be suspended for the first two games anyway, transferring out of the program. Grab the points. 10* best bet. |
|||||||
02-02-14 | Seattle Seahawks v. Denver Broncos -2.5 | Top | 43-8 | Loss | -110 | 293 h 24 m | Show |
I
|
|||||||
01-19-14 | San Francisco 49ers v. Seattle Seahawks -3 | Top | 17-23 | Win | 100 | 138 h 28 m | Show |
I
|
|||||||
01-19-14 | New England Patriots v. Denver Broncos -4 | Top | 16-26 | Win | 100 | 135 h 6 m | Show |
I
|
|||||||
01-12-14 | San Diego Chargers v. Denver Broncos -9.5 | Top | 17-24 | Loss | -105 | 152 h 44 m | Show |
I
|
|||||||
01-05-14 | San Diego Chargers v. Cincinnati Bengals -6.5 | Top | 27-10 | Loss | -115 | 145 h 53 m | Show |
I
|
|||||||
01-04-14 | New Orleans Saints +3 v. Philadelphia Eagles | Top | 26-24 | Win | 100 | 10 h 10 m | Show |
I
|
|||||||
01-02-14 | Oklahoma v. Alabama -16.5 | Top | 45-31 | Loss | -110 | 11 h 7 m | Show |
I
|
|||||||
01-01-14 | Central Florida +17 v. Baylor | Top | 52-42 | Win | 100 | 28 h 8 m | Show |
I
|
|||||||
01-01-14 | Michigan State v. Stanford -6.5 | Top | 24-20 | Loss | -109 | 25 h 34 m | Show |
I'm playing on STANFORD. In the smaller December bowl games, the more motivated team will often get the cover. That becomes less of a factor as we get into the bigger January bowls, as both teams are generally happy to be here. That means the coaching and talent will typically be the deciding factors, turnovers notwithstanding. In this case, both teams are well-coached and both teams are talented. That said, I believe Stanford is a little better offensively and that the Michigan State is going to have some trouble keeping up.
The Spartans average 29.8 points per game, 5.4 yards per play. Meanwhile, the Cardinal average 33.2 ppg and 6.4 ypp. Over the last three games, those numbers are even more slanted in Stanford's favor. The Cardinal are averaging 42.7 points their last three games, a whopping 513 yards and 7.7 yards per play. Conversely, the Spartans are averaging 26 points and 408.7 yards their last three games. Some could potentially argue that this game is bigger for MSU. While it is true that Stanford has been here before and would have liked bigger things, this is the 100th edition of the Rose Bowl. I don't believe "lack of motivation" to be a factor. While its been a while since they met a team from the Pac-12 (previously Pac-10) the Spartans have never fared too well when they did. I expect that to continue to the case here, as Stanford picks up a big win and cover. 10* |
|||||||
12-31-13 | Duke v. Texas A&M -11.5 | Top | 48-52 | Loss | -116 | 12 h 57 m | Show |
I`m playing on TEXAS A&M. In many ways, the Blue Devils have had a more successful season than the Aggies. One could certainly argue that they`ve over-achieved while the Aggies have under-achieved. That`s definitely been the case at the betting window. I believe the Aggies are laying this many points for good reason though. I expect them to rise to the occasion with a big double-digit win.
The Blue Devils were able to more than hold their own against mediocre or good opponents. When facing an elite team - Florida State - in their last game, they were outclassed, a 45-7 blowout. While the Aggies aren`t in the Seminoles class defensively, they do have a bigtime offense, led by an elite QB. The Aggies average 586 yards per game on the season, 43.6 points. They should put up big numbers against a Duke defense which allowed more than 400 yards per game. The Blue Devils averaged only 23 points per game on the road this season. Johnny Manziel will likely be playing his final college game and he`ll be looking to go out with a bang. Having lost their games against ranked teams this year, the entire team figures to have something to prove. I don't think Duke will be able to keep up. 10* |
|||||||
12-31-13 | Boston College +7.5 v. Arizona | Top | 19-42 | Loss | -110 | 310 h 56 m | Show |
I'm playing on BOSTON COLLEGE. I've had excellent success in picking my spots to back the Eagles this season. I believe this will prove to be another good spot to do so.
This matchup features two of the best running backs in college football. BC's Andre Williams became just the 16th back in NCAA history to crack the 2000 yard barrier and the first since 2007 to turn the trick. Arizona's Carey led the nation in rushing last year and followed up with another big year (1700+ yards) this year. The teams are similar in many ways. Both teams started the year with question marks at quarterback but with Williams and Carey carrying the mail as the focal point of the offense, the Eagle's Chase Rettig (a 4-year starter) and the Cat's B.J. Denker have both developed into solid game managers. Both teams are somewhat suspect on defense. Boston College rocks the nation's 107th ranked pass defense, a stop unit that allowed opposing QB's to complete 67% of their passes with a 24-9 TD/Int ratio. The good news for the Wildcats in August was that they returned all 11 started from an outfit that allowed 35 points and 499 ypg last year. The bad news is that this same crew allowed 25 points-per-game on 409 yards per this year. In a game that figures to see a lot of running, note that the Eagles' defense has been a little better against the run. BC allowed 154 rushing yards per game, 3.9 per carry. Meanwhile, Arizona allowed 170 rushing yards per game, 4.2 per carry. The Eagles were 4-2 ATS as underdogs and 4-0 ATS against teams with a winning record. On the other hand, Arizona was only 2-4 SU/ATS against teams with a winning record. I believe that its worth mentioning that the Eagles played Florida State much tougher than any other team in the country did. In a game that could easily come down to the wire, it should also be noted that the Eagles have one of the best kickers in the country, The bottom line is that I believe that these are two evenly matched teams, far more so than is indicated by the line. That being the case, I believe grabbing all those generous points will prove the way to go. 10* |
|||||||
12-30-13 | Middle Tenn State +7 v. Navy | Top | 6-24 | Loss | -115 | 24 h 19 m | Show |
I'm playing on MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE. Both teams come in on a roll. Navy is off a 34-7 win over Army, its fourth straight victory. The Blue Raiders are off a 48-17 victory, their fifth in a row. While the Midshipmen are always tough, I don't believe they should be laying this many points against a team which is arguably playing as well as they are.
The Blue Raiders should be happy to be here, always an important factor in bowls. They felt snubbed by not being chosen for a bowl game last season. Their last bowl game was in 2010 and they lost that one. Coach Stockstill said this of the Blue Raiders: "I told them to think back to their emotions that they had at this time last year and to understand and appreciate how special going to this bowl is going to be." The Navy option attack is never easy to stop. Having more time to prepare for it helps though. Also, note that the The Blue Raiders' run defense improved down the stretch, allowing an average of 116.6 yards over the last three games. In addition to having a QB who threw for nearly 2300 yards and 16 TDs, the Raiders have a pair or backs, who have combined for more than 1400 yards on the ground, Parker with 767 and Whatley with 640. The Raiders, who will a Navy team which gave up 35 or more five times, have averaged 42.6 points over their last five games. I expect them put up enough points to earn at least a cover here. 10* |
|||||||
12-29-13 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers v. New Orleans Saints -12.5 | Top | 17-42 | Win | 100 | 126 h 53 m | Show |
I'm playing on NEW ORLEANS. I won with the Bucs when these teams met earlier in the season, at Tampa. I don't doubt that the Bucs will fight hard again here. However, in this case I don't think "fighting hard" will be enough.
While the Bucs were able to go toe-to-toe with the Saints at Tampa, that figures to be a much tougher task. Its no secret that the Saints have struggled on the road while dominating at home. The Saints' last game here was a 31-13 win over Carolina. Including that victory, the Saints are 7-0 here, outscoring teams by an average of 32.9 to 15.4. Meanwhile, the Bucs have averaged a mere 15.7 points, while winning just one of their seven road games. The Saints average 439.7 yards of offense per game here, 6.7 per play. Conversely, the Bucs average just 266.4 yards per game on the road, only 4.8 per play. Over their last three games, the Bucs are averaging a paltry 199.7 yards, just 3.8 per play. Those kind of stats just won't cut it here, not against a Saints team which will be desperate and which should keep its foot on the gas the entire way. Last year's game here resulted in a 41-0 win for the Saints. I expect this one to also turn ugly. 10* |
|||||||
12-29-13 | Kansas City Chiefs +9.5 v. San Diego Chargers | Top | 24-27 | Win | 100 | 9 h 49 m | Show |
I'm playing on KC. Its true that the Chiefs are locked into the #5 seed. That's going to keep a lot of people off them which in turn has caused the line to be very high. I believe that generous line is providing us with excellent value.
The Chargers should know whether or not the game matters by the time it starts. They need Miami and Baltimore to both lose, or tie. Either way, I expect both teams to be motivated. Reid has publicly discussed resting some starters. Regardless of who is in there, I expect the Chiefs to go all out to win the game. In my opinion, they can't afford to "back in" to the playoffs and not be playing well. I backed the Chargers when these teams met at KC on 11/24. I felt the line was too high. San Diego won outright, 41-38. I believe the fact that the Chargers beat them should provide further motivation for the Chiefs to return the favor here. The Chiefs have been money (6-1 ATS) on the road, outscoring teams by a 31.6 to 16.6 margin. While anything could happen, I don't see them getting blown out here. 10* |
|||||||
12-28-13 | Michigan v. Kansas State -5.5 | Top | 14-31 | Win | 100 | 14 h 17 m | Show |
I'm playing on KANSAS STATE. Its true that Bill Snyder hasn't had much success in the bowls of late. I expect that to finally change tonight.
With five wins in their final six games, the Wildcats are playing with confidence. Needless to say, Snyder desperately wants to break the bowl drought. His players desperately want to do it for him. They'll be catching a Michigan team which will be playing without its starting QB. Freshman Shane Morris will be making his first career start. Considering that starting QB Devin Gardner threw for 451 yards and four touchdowns last game out, that's a big deal. While a first time starter would normally like to rely on a solid ground game to help him out, Michigan isn't strong in that department. The Wolverines average 3.2 yards per carry, 112th in the country and their worst mark this millennium. While the Wolverines would prefer to be in a bigger bowl, this is a big deal to the Wildcats. Junior linebacker Jonathan Truman noted: "Nobody on our team has won a bowl game, with the exception of the coaches. We need it. We want it really bad." I look for the healthier, hungrier team to win this one, picking up the cover along the way. 10* |
|||||||
12-23-13 | Atlanta Falcons +13 v. San Francisco 49ers | Top | 24-34 | Win | 100 | 108 h 12 m | Show |
I'm playing on ATLANTA. Needless to say, the 49'ers have had a much better season than the Falcons. That doesn't mean that the Falcons aren't offering value here though.
At this time of the years, when a team (like Atlanta) is out of playoff race, one has to try and determine if the game actually means anything. In this case, I believe that the game does mean a lot to the Falcons. For starters, the Falcons believe that they are much better than their record indicates. Playing a nationally televised game against a quality opponent, this is a final chance to prove that to the world. Winning what may be the final game at Candlestick would be all the more sweet. Additionally, you may recall that these teams met in the playoffs. The 49'ers overcame a double-digit halftime deficit to win that game by a score of 28-24. That figures to provide the Falcons with further motivation, as that game was essentially the start of their "demise." Naturally, the 49'ers will also really want to close out the Candlestick era with a victory. While I certainly respect their team, I feel that winning by two touchdowns or more is asking a lot. True, yesterday's win by Arizona (at Seattle) changed the dynamics of this game, significantly. The 49'ers now have a little more pressure on them, than most were expecting. (I personally didn't play the Seattle/Arizona game but admit that I thought the Hawks were likely to win "SU.") Note that the 49'ers play at Arizona next week too. So, this game became a lot more important to them, when the Cards scored the upset. That makes it even bigger for the Falcons too, in my opinion. Now, they get a chance to potentially do some spoliing. (They'd surely feel more love for the Cardinals than the 49'ers, the team which killed last year's dreams.) While the 49'ers could now be feeling some pressure, the Falcons have none. I believe that makes them dangerous. The Falcons have won two of three, each of those three games decided by a field goal or less. Going back further shows that each of their last five games has been decided by 13 or fewer points. I look for this one to prove much closer than most will be expecting and am grabbing all the points I can get. 10* |
|||||||
12-22-13 | Cleveland Browns v. NY Jets -2 | Top | 13-24 | Win | 100 | 25 h 6 m | Show |
I'm playing on the NEW YORK JETS. With last week's loss at Carolina and with Baltimore's subsequent win at Detroit, the Jets are officially eliminated from postseason contention. I don't expect them to pack it in though.
The Jets, who may well be playing for Ryan's job, have indeed struggled on the road. However, they've been very tough here at home. In fact, they've won five of seven home games, most recently a double-digit win over the Raiders. The combination of this being their home finale and that they're potentially playing for Ryan's job, figures to provide plenty of motivation. QB Geno Smith had this to say about playing hard for Ryan and about his feelings for the Jets' coach. "We're going out there and playing for Rex because he's our head coach and we want to play hard for him and we want to win games for him. He coaches us hard, he puts the time and effort in and he deserves for our team to go out and that's what we do every single week. I love Rex. And despite what decision is made, my feelings toward him will never change." While the Jets have won five of seven here, the Browns have just one win in six road tries. Having already played their home finale and with a revenge game against Pittsburgh on deck, I'm not sure that they'll be quite as hungry as the Jets. Even if they are "motivated," the Browns simply aren't playing very well right now. They've lost five straight, giving up an average of 33 points in those losses. Over the last two weeks, they've given up 658 passing yards and more than 900 overall. All teams are dealing with injuries at this time of the year and the Jets and Browns are no exception. The Browns' injury list is arguably bigger than the Jets' list though. While the Browns are 1-4 SU/ATS the last five times that they played a game with a line ranging from -3 to +3, the Jets are 2-0 SU/ATS when listed as home favorites of three or less. All things considered, I feel this line could easily be higher. 10* |
|||||||
12-21-13 | Buffalo +1 v. San Diego State | Top | 24-49 | Loss | -112 | 75 h 58 m | Show |
I'm playing on Buffalo. Motivation typically plays an important role in who covers in bowl games. In this case, I believe that Buffalo will be the more motivated team.
The Bulls have had a nice season despite losing two of three down the stretch and getting mauled by Ohio State and Baylor in their first two games. In between, Buffalo went on a run of seven straight wins to lock up the second bowl appearance in school history and first since the 2008 Turner Gill led team. The Aztecs had a similar season to Buffalo, starting the year 0-3 including a loss to I-AA Eastern Illinois before winning seven of eight and finally getting crushed at UNLV in their finale. SDSU goes bowling for the fourth straight year, staying home twice and playing in New Orleans. That said, one has to wonder how excited the Aztecs are to be in frigid Boise. I think the difference in this bowl will be the physicality of the MAC team. San Diego State hasn't fared well against big imposing outfits and that's exactly what the find here with the Bulls. The Buffalo defense was staunch against its own kind holding the opponents in their seven game run to just 73 total points. They are led by stud linebacker Khalil Mack who will be playing on Sundays. On offense, UB is unspectacular but still averages almost 31 ppg led by the school's all-time leading rusher Oliver and deep threat at wide out ..... Alex Neutz. The Aztecs do some things well with walk-on QB Quinn Kaehler and 2X 1000-yard rusher Adam Meuma but both players production waned towards the end of the year and both were no-shows vs UNLV in a game that the Aztecs really needed to have. Not only can SDSU be bullied around, the Aztecs' special teams are an abomination. San Diego States' PK's are 8-15 kicking FGs and have missed six extra points. The return and cover units are below average as well. costing SDSU key field position. While neither of these two mid-majors are particularly special, I expect the more physical, more fundamentally sound and more highly motivated Buffalo team to win its first bowl. 10* |
|||||||
12-15-13 | Cincinnati Bengals v. Pittsburgh Steelers +3 | Top | 20-30 | Win | 100 | 104 h 32 m | Show |
I'm playing on PITTSBURGH. The Bengals have enjoyed a much better season and enter as the hotter team. I like how this one sets up for the Steelers though.
Its true that the playoffs are now extremely unlikely for Pittsburgh. This is not a team which will go through the motions or plan for next year though. This is a team with great pride, that plays to win. The recent gaffes - along with a chance to beat a hated rival on National TV - should provide plenty of motivation. Despite coming up short last week, the Steelers have still won three of their last four home games. They've still got a 4-1 ATS record their last five games. While the Bengals are still trying to lock up a playoff spot, they'll still be in good position to do so, even with a loss here. Having lost at Cincinnati and off back-to-back losses, the Steelers should be highly motivated. As Jerricho Cotchery noted: "We didn't win the first game against these guys. We are going to be up for the challenge. Guys are going to be ready to play." Le'Veon Bell added: "We know what's at stake. Guys just have to be ready. We have to be ready for it." While Dalton is getting more headlines, Rothlisberger is also playing well. Much better than he was when the teams met previously. In fact, he's thrown 11 TDs over his last four games, completing 63% of his passes, without throwng a single interception. Even with the earlier loss, Rothlisberger is still 14-6 for his career against Cincinnati. The Steelers are (relatively) healthy, hungry and getting points at home. They're 3-1 ATS in divisional games and I expect them to be at their best here. 10* |
|||||||
12-15-13 | Arizona Cardinals v. Tennessee Titans +3 | Top | 37-34 | Push | 0 | 25 h 45 m | Show |
I'm playing on TENNESSEE. I'm happy to be getting points with the Titans here as I expect them to win outright.
While the Cardinals have admittedly been playing well in recent weeks, they're still only 2-4 away from Arizona this season. The two road wins came at Tampa and at Jacksonville, a pair of teams in the state of Florida. The Cards won't be seeing any "Florida-like weather" here though. With the wind chill, it figures to be pretty nasty. While Arizona certainly "needs" this game, off a divisional win and with a huge showdown with Seattle on deck, I feel that this will be a tough spot. While Tennessee has missed Locker, note that Arizona has a larger number of injuries overall. That includes Tyrann Mathieu, the second leading tackler on the team, who went down last week. Mathieu had done a lot for this defense and I expect him to be missed. The Cards are 0-2 ATS as road favorites of three or fewer points the past couple of seasons. Both ATS losses were also SU losses. With Jacksonville and Houston on deck, the Titans figure they can still salvage a .500 season. I look for and expect them to go all out in taking the first step towards that goal this afternoon. 10* |
|||||||
12-15-13 | Buffalo Bills -2 v. Jacksonville Jaguars | Top | 27-20 | Win | 100 | 21 h 23 m | Show |
I'm playing on BUFFALO. One could easily make a case for the Jaguars here. After all, they've caught fire in recent weeks while the Bills are off a blowout loss. I believe that Buffalo is favored for good reason though.
Both teams are 4-9 on the season. However, a closer look reveals that the Bills score more points AND they allow less. Buffalo averages 21 points and 327.8 yards on offense. Jacksonville, on the other hand, manages a mere 15.8 points per game, just 285.2 yards per game. (At home, the Jags' numbers dip to 10.4 ppg and 258.2 ypg!) On the other side of the ball, the Jags are allowing 28.6 ppg and 382.9 ypg. Meanwhile, the Bills are permitting 25.7 ppg and 345.8 ypg. The Bills are 8-6 ATS the past couple of seasons, when off two or more consecutive losses. During the same stretch, the Jags are only 1-5 ATS when off a divisional victory. Note that the Jags are currently dealing with a few key injuries. Maurice Jones-Drew, Jonathan Cyrpien and Cecil Shorts are all banged-up. If any/all of them play, they may be at less than 100%. The Bills were six point favorites when these teams met last December. They won by a score of 34-18, dominating the time of possession and holding a commanding 232-50 advantage on the ground. I expect another win and cover on Sunday afternoon. 10* |
|||||||
12-08-13 | Carolina Panthers v. New Orleans Saints -4 | Top | 13-31 | Win | 102 | 131 h 20 m | Show |
I'm playing on NEW ORLEANS. The Panthers are rolling right now and they certainly looked better than the Saints last week. Admittedly, the Panthers' defense is very good. I believe that the Saints have the better coach, the better QB and the better offense though. Combine all that with the fact they're playing at home and I expect them to overcome the fact that they're playing on a short week and for them to finish on top.
True, the Saints looked pretty bad at Seattle last week. Its important not to over-react to a single game though. Its also important to remember that last week's game was played up in the Pacific Northwest, where the Seahawks have been unbeatable. This game, however, is being played at New Orleans, where its been the Saints who are unbeatable. Big difference. In six games here, the Saints are 6-0 SU and 5-1 ATS. They've outscored opposing teams by an average score of 33.2 to 15.8 here, out gaining them by an average margin of 450.8 to 270.2, in terms of total yards. Brees, who will be highly motivated to bounce back from last week's subpar effort, has topped 300 passing yards in all six home games this season. He's thrown 19 touchdowns against just three interceptions here. He's got a 122.2 home passer rating. The Panthers have been solid on the road but not dominant like New Orleans has been at home. The Saints haven't lost consecutive games in a single regular season under Payton since 2009. While they may have more trouble at Carolina in a couple of weeks, I expect the Saints to make a statement Sunday night. 10* |
|||||||
12-08-13 | Seattle Seahawks v. San Francisco 49ers -2.5 | Top | 17-19 | Loss | -118 | 127 h 14 m | Show |
I'm playing on SAN FRANCISCO. Admittedly, the Seahawks looked very impressive last week. Admittedly, its going to be tough to beat them up in the Pacific Northwest. They're not at home here though and they're up against another very talented team - one which is also playing very well - and one which is determined to deliver some payback, for an earlier loss at Seattle.
The 49'ers, who are off back-to-back double-digit wins, are 8-2 ATS as favorites this season and they're 2-0 ATS when playing a game with a line in the +3 to -3 range. The 49'ers, who were embarrassed (29-3) at Seattle in September, are also 7-3 ATS the last 10 times that they attempted to avenge an earlier loss. In addition to the revenge factor, the 49'ers arguably have more to play for. Seattle has already clinched a playoff spot, while they have not. While the 49'ers are playing on a "normal" week, the Seahawks are playing on a short week, due to having played on Monday. As they did this year, the Seahawks hammered the 49'ers at Seattle last season. However, the 49'ers won by seven when the teams met here at SF. In fact, they've outscored the Hawks by a 109-54 margin the last four meetings here. While I won with the "under" when these teams first met, I believe the value now lies with the revenge-minded home team. 10* |
|||||||
12-08-13 | Oakland Raiders v. NY Jets -2.5 | Top | 27-37 | Win | 100 | 124 h 52 m | Show |
I'm playing on the NEW YORK JETS. While the Jets made me look pretty bad last week, I really like them in this spot.
Lets not forget that the Raiders, who are playing out the string, are a West Coast based team, playing an early game in the Eastern Time Zone. Lets also keep in mind that its expected to be very cold, something the Jets are more accustomed to than their guests from California. Even after last week, the Jets aren't out of the playoff picture quite yet. They will be if they lose there though. Note that three of their final four opponents (incl. Oakland) are currently .500 or worse. Offensive tackle D'Brickashaw Ferguson noted: "There's definitely a sense of urgency now. You recognize there are four games left and we recognize the challenge that's before us, but all we can do is just keep our heads down and grind right now and focus on our work." The Raiders like to rely on the ground game, which helps out McGloin. However, they're banged up at the running back position and they'll be facing a Jets' defense which is the best in the entire league against the run. The Raiders are a dismal 37-69-5 over the years, when playing with a line in the -3 to +3 range. That includes an 0-2 SU/ATS mark in that situation, since the start of November. While its true that he hasn't performed at an elite level, I like that Ryan is sticking with Smith at QB. I believe he gives them the best chance to win here. While I've already acknowledged that they didn't play well last week, the Jets are still a solid 4-2 SU/ATS here at home. Prior to the Miami loss, they'd beaten the Saints in the previous game. With more to play for and the venue/weather/start time in their favor, I like the Jets to bounce back with their best effort, en route to a much needed win and cover. 10* |
|||||||
12-07-13 | Ohio State -5 v. Michigan State | Top | 24-34 | Loss | -110 | 15 h 18 m | Show |
I'm playing on OHIO STATE. Despite their perfect record, a lot of people don't seem to believe in the Buckeyes. That sentiment has kept this line lower than it otherwise could have been. I believe its also helped us by providing excellent value.
Needless to say, the stakes are very high for both teams. While both ultimately just want to win, it should be noted that an "impressive" win by the Buckeyes would potentially go along way in helping to fend off a one-loss SEC champion in the BCS standings. True, the Buckeyes only beat the Wolverines by a point last week and are now 0-3 ATS their last three. However, last week's game was at Michigan and the previous two games were still blowout wins, as they won by 28 and 25 points. Even with last week's nail biter, which should actually serve them well here, the Buckeyes are still outscoring teams by an average of 28 points per game. They score an average of 48.2 ppg (50 on the road) and allow 20.2. While also impressive, Michigan State arguably hasn't been as dominant. The Spartans score 29.4 (30.4 on the road) and allow 11.7 (13.6 on the road.) While we have to go back a bit, note that Michigan State is 4-6 SU/ATS its last 10 in a dome while Ohio State is 8-4 ATS (10-2 SU) in domes, during the same time. Don't forget that Ohio State has now won 24 straight games. Urban Meyer had this to say: ''I feel very strongly about my team. I would take this team anywhere with me. A team that knows how to win and refuses to lose is a special team and this is a very special team.'' Ultimately, I look for Ohio State's superior offense to be too much for the Spartans. I expect the Buckeyes to keep the winning streak in tact and look for them to cover the small number along the way. 10* |
|||||||
12-05-13 | Houston Texans -2.5 v. Jacksonville Jaguars | Top | 20-27 | Loss | -125 | 59 h 18 m | Show |
I'm playing on HOUSTON. These teams both have bad records. For the Jaguars, that was expected. It wasn't supposed to be like that for the Texans though, as they were anticipating a big year. One of the low-points of the Houston season was when the Jags beat them. Now, they get a chance to avenge that loss on National TV - a chance to show the country that they're a much better team than their record indicates. I expect them to rise to the occasion, making the most of that opportunity.
Andre Johnson called the loss to the Jags the "lowest point" of his 11-year NFL career. While the Jags have actually won two in a row, both came on the road. They're 0-4 SU/ATS when listed as the home team, getting outscored by a 29 to 6.2 average. In fact, they've lost seven straight home games, dating back to last season. While the Jags are being out gained by an average margin of 381 to 285.6 (394.5 to 252.5 at Jax!) the Texans are out gaining teams by an average of 365.2 to 303.9, in terms of total yards per game. The Texans are 3-0-1 ATS the last four times that they were favored by three or fewer points on the road. They're also 7-3 ATS the last 10 times that they attempted to avenge an earlier loss. Off the tough loss vs. the Pats and on an extended losing streak, some of the Texan players may not be thrilled about the short turn-around in between games. I don't think its a bad thing though. Houston offensive lineman Duane Brown said this of playing on the short week: "That |
|||||||
12-01-13 | Denver Broncos v. Kansas City Chiefs +6.5 | Top | 35-28 | Loss | -110 | 9 h 56 m | Show |
I'm playing on KC. I won with the Broncos when these teams met at Denver. However, with the rematch being played at Arrowhead, I'm expecting a much different result.
I successfully played against KC last week. Favored vs. the Chargers and perhaps looking ahead to this game, the Chiefs lost outright. Keep in mind that they only lost by three points though and also that it was their first home loss of the entire season. True, the KC defense was shredded by the Chargers. However, the offense also put up huge (38) points and even elite defenses are capable of having an off-day. Safety Eric Berry said this of the KC defense. "It's not the end of the world. But we do have a sense of urgency this week to get the things corrected that we see on tape." The Chiefs do have a couple of key injuries. The same is true of Denver though. Even with last week's loss here, the Chiefs are still outscoring teams by an average score of 25 to 17.3 here. Meanwhile, the Broncos have shown that they can be vulnerable. They blew the big lead at New England last week, Manning compiling a 70.4 passer rating. With that loss, the Broncos are only 2-2 their last four road games. All four of those games were close, each decided by eight or less. Overall, Denver scored 143 points, allowing 141. Speaking of close games, the Chiefs last three home games have all been decided by six or fewer points. I won't be surprised to see this one also come down to the wire and with the line having climbed from its opener, I believe we're getting excellent value with what should be a highly motivated home underdog. 10* |
|||||||
12-01-13 | Miami Dolphins v. NY Jets -1 | Top | 23-3 | Loss | -120 | 31 h 37 m | Show |
I'm playing on the NY JETS. The road team took both meetings in last year's season series. However, this Sunday afternoon, I look for the home team to finish on top.
The Jets have NOT played well on the road. Last week, they lost 19-3 at Baltimore. The previous week, they were blown out 37-14 by Buffalo. Their previous road game before that? A 49-9 loss at Cincinnati. Games at NY have been much different though. The Jets beat the Saints in their most recent game here and they beat the Patriots in their previous home game. Needless to say, those are a pair of pretty good teams. Overall, the Jets are 4-1 SU/ATS at home. That's considerably better than Miami's 2-3 SU/ATS mark on the road. The Dolphins have dropped three straight on the road overall. One of Miami's big problems recently has been an inability to run the football. After managing a mere two rushing yards vs. TB, a franchise low, the Dolphins only gained 52 rushing yards vs. Carolina last week. Offensive coordinator Mike Sherman noted: "You have to be able to run the ball to be effective. We just have to find a way to get the balance that we so desperately need. We don't have that balance right now." The Jets are already 1-0 SU/ATS as home favorites of three or fewer points, beating Buffalo by seven here, as a 2.5 point favorite. While both teams have some "issues," playing on their homefield, I believe it will be the Jets who bounce back with a very important victory. 10* |
|||||||
12-01-13 | New England Patriots v. Houston Texans +9 | Top | 34-31 | Win | 100 | 6 h 30 m | Show |
I'm playing on HOUSTON. I've had some success playing on/against the Patriots. Most recently, I backed them in last week's win over Denver. I feel that they're laying too many points this week though and am now going against them.
The Pats, who may be ripe for a letdown after last week, haven't been the same team away from Foxboro. In fact, they've lost three straight on the road, falling at Carolina, NY and Cincinnati. The Texans have not been good to me this season. In fact, they've proven downright costly. They're getting more points than they usually do here though. If they'd been getting this many points every week, they'd be 8-3 ATS. Only three of their losses have been by greater than a TD - none of their last five. The Pats average a respectable 362.4 yards per game on the road. The Texans average 407.2 ypg here at Houston though. While New England gains an average of 5.4 yards per play on the road, the Texans average 5.8 ypp here at home. On defense, the Texans allow a mere 287 yards per game at Houston, compared to the 353.4 average that the Pats allow per game on the road. Brady said this of the Texans: "They have a lot of the same guys they had last year. We're not even concerned about the record. You look at what they can do defensively and the kind of playmakers they have. ... They have probably the best front we've faced all season." The fact that the Pats knocked them out of the playoffs last season should provide the Texans with some added motivation here. They've been at their best off a division loss in recent seasons and I expect them to bounce back with their best effort here. 10* |
|||||||
11-30-13 | Texas A&M +5 v. Missouri | Top | 21-28 | Loss | -105 | 51 h 18 m | Show |
I'm playing on TEXAS A@M. While the Tigers have had a much better season, I won't be surprised if the Aggies score the upset here. At the least, I expect them to give the Tigers all they can handle. That makes the points an attractive option.
True, the Aggies got blown out at LSU last week. However, they'd won their previous three games by a combined score of 164-72. For the season, Manziel and the Aggies are averaging 45.6 ppg, good for sixth best in the country. While the Aggies 356.1 passing yards per game is among the nation's best, Manziel can also beat teams with his legs. Josh Dobbs and Jalen Whitlow (Tennessee & Kentucky) both had some success in picking up chunks on the ground against the Tigers - and Manziel is more dangerous runner than either of those QBs. Yes, the Aggies have a few losses. However, Missouri hasn't had to face any of the three teams (Alabama, Auburns, LSU) that defeated Texas A@M. While Missouri won by 14 at Ole Miss last week, the game could have easily been much closer. Keep in mind that the Tigers are still only a month removed from losing to South Carolina. So, they aren't unbeatable. The Aggies are 6-3 SU/ATS their last nine off a conference loss. The last time that they were in that situation, they hammered Vanderbilt by a score of 56-24. I expect them to bounce back with another big effort here, en route to AT LEAST a cover. 10* |
|||||||
11-30-13 | Alabama -10 v. Auburn | Top | 28-34 | Loss | -110 | 47 h 60 m | Show |
I'm playing on ALABAMA. While the Tide are fairly heavy favorites, there seems to be quite a lot of talk about Auburn scoring an upset here. I'm not buying it.
The Tide have been dominant on both sides of the ball. They began the season with a 35-10 win over V-Tech. That was followed by a 7-point win at Texas A@M. Since then, the Tide have defeated all nine opponents by double-digits. Only one of those opponents scored more than 10 points. That was LSU, which got 17. Alabama still won by 21. Both teams have put up big points on offense. Auburn is averaging 39 ppg. Alabama average 39.7. Auburn has averaged 7.1 yards per play. Alabama is averaging 7 yards per play. Its on the defensive side of the ball where Bama really has the edge. The Tide are allowing an average of 9.3 points and 263.9 yards per game. The Tigers, on the other hand, are allowing 22 ppg and 406.9 ypg. While opposing teams are managing only 4.6 yards per play against the Tide, they average 5.7 ypp vs. the Tigers. Alabama has outscored conference opponents by a 39.6 to 11.9 average., out gaining them by nearly 200 yards per game. On the other hand, Auburn has outscored them by a 36.1 to 28 margin, out gaining them by an average of 18 yards per game. While Auburn certainly deserves a lot of credit for an excellent season, the Tigers could easily have a few more losses. I believe that their magic runs out here. Alabama won last year's game by a score of 49-0. The year before, playing at Auburn, the Tide won by a 42-14 score. The Tigers again have homefield advantage and they've had an extra week to prepare. In the end, I don't think it will be enough. I expect another double-digit win for Saban and the Tide. 10* |
|||||||
11-29-13 | Fresno State v. San Jose State +8 | Top | 52-62 | Win | 100 | 23 h 16 m | Show |
I'm playing on SAN JOSE STATE. This game is very important for both teams. The Bulldogs are looking to remain perfect, hoping to get to a BCS bowl game. The Spartans are looking to ruin that dream while becoming bowl eligible themselves.
Its true that Fresno State has a big time passing attack, led by Derek Carr. San Jose State's QB (Fales) is no slouch either though, arguably the best QB that Fresno will have faced. While Fales has thrown a few too many (13) interceptions this season, the fifth-year senior has also completed 62.2% of his passes for 3,642 yards and 27 TDs. Note that the Spartans' offense that has put up 600 or more yards in three games for the first time in school history. While the Spartans have dropped back-to-back games here, both losses came by six or fewer points. Prior to the recent skid, they'd won four straight. While they've blown out their last few opponents, the Bulldogs have still seen four games decided by seven or fewer points this season. Note that I'm not necessarily sold on their special teams' unit. The Spartans, who have had one more day of rest and preparation time than the Bulldogs, are an excellent 13-4 ATS as underdogs the past couple of seasons. With so much on the line, I expect Fales and co. to bring their A-Game and for the Spartans to rise to the occasion with at least another cover. 10* |
|||||||
11-28-13 | Pittsburgh Steelers v. Baltimore Ravens -2.5 | Top | 20-22 | Loss | -126 | 58 h 48 m | Show |
I'm playing on BALTIMORE. This is a pivotal game for both teams. The winner will be very much alive in the playoff race - although still far from a lock - the loser will be nearly out of the hunt. Playing at home, I like the defending champs to rise to the occasion.
The Steelers did look impressive in beating the Browns last week, at Cleveland. They're only 1-6 ATS the last seven times that they were off a divisional win though and they're still a dismal 7-15 ATS the last 22 times that they played on the road overall. Even with last week's win, the Steelers are still getting outscored by a 24.5 to 22 average margin on the road this season, getting outgained by an average of 387.2 to 349.5, in terms of total yards. On the other hand, despite not putting up many yards, the Ravens are outscoring teams by a fairly commanding 20 to 10.8 average margin here at Baltimore. Not surprisingly, they're 4-1 SU and 4-0-1 ATS here. The lone loss came against the Packers, with Rodgers. Needless to say, the defense has been excellent in front of the home fans. While both teams figure to be desperate, having already lost at Pittsburgh, the Ravens may be even more so. The Ravens are 4-2 ATS the last six times that they were home favorites of three or less. While this series has historically been close, I expect the Ravens to come out on top and believe they'll do enough to cover the small number. 10* |
|||||||
11-25-13 | San Francisco 49ers v. Washington Redskins +6.5 | Top | 27-6 | Loss | -110 | 81 h 1 m | Show |
I'm playing on WASHINGTON. While the 49'ers have had a better overall season, both teams are off back-to-back losses. Both teams badly need a victory. Playing at home and getting more than a field goal, I believe the Redskins are offering excellent value.
After back-to-back road losses, the Redskins figure to be happy to return home. They've averaged better than 30 points per game here this season, putting up better than 450 yards per game. In their last two games here, the Skins defeated the Chargers and the Bears. While the 49'ers are probably stronger than either of those teams, they haven't been able to score many points recently. While SF has totaled just 29 combined points its last two games, Washington has managed a total of 75 in its last two here at home. After playing in SF two weeks ago and in a dome last week, the west-coast based 49'ers may not enjoy the cold weather here. Note that this is the first time all season that they played back-to-back "true" road games. (They did play a neutral game vs. the Jags, after playing a road game.) The last time that they were in that situation was last December and they lost the second of those games (at Seattle on 12/23/12) by a score of 43-12. The previous time that they were in that situation, they lost outright at St. Louis, when laying -7.5 points. That loss happened to be immediately following a game vs. the Saints, at New Orleans. Even with a 3-7 record, given the poor records of the other NFC East teams, the Skins aren't completely out of the race. At the very least, tonight's game offers a chance to show the world that they're better than the record indicates. Looking at the last couple of years and we find that the 49'ers are 3-5 ATS when playing a team with a losing record during the second half of the season. Meanwhile, during the same period, the Skins are 5-2-1 ATS when facing a team with a winning record, during the second half of the season. I expect them to step up with AT LEAST a cover. 10* |
|||||||
11-24-13 | Denver Broncos v. New England Patriots +2.5 | Top | 31-34 | Win | 100 | 57 h 52 m | Show |
I'm playing on NEW ENGLAND. I successfully backed the Broncos vs. the Chiefs last week. However, I believe the value lies the other way here.
Last week's win was at home. Sunday's game is on the road, at hostile New England. Big difference. The Broncos haven't exactly been dominant on the road in recent weeks. They won by eight at San Diego in their last game. However, their two previous road games resulted in a 6-point loss and a 3-point win. Their only "big" road win was against the Giants, way back in Week 2. That "big road win" was back in September. Back when Manning was still healthy. That's no longer the case here. Manning is now playing at less than 100% health. Playing at home, he still had enough to outduel Alex Smith and the conservative Chiefs. Now, he's on the road though - and now he's up against an opponent which is typically capable of putting up more points on the board than the Chiefs. The Patriots have long been outstanding in the underdog role. They're 79-46-4 the last 129 times that they were getting points. That includes a 9-3-1 ATS mark as home underdogs of three or fewer points. Lets not forget that the Patriots last three games here have all resulted in victories. They showed an ability to come from behind, in beating a very good New Orleans team. Next, they beat a division rival (Miami) by double-digits. That was followed by a 55-31 destruction of Pittsburgh, in their most recent game here. Going back further finds the Pats at 5-0 here, outscoring teams by an average of 12 points. That's better than Denver's 3-1 road record. Some might be surprised that the Pats' margin of victory on the road it much better than the Broncos, who are outscoring teams by an average of 5.7 points per road game. Manning may break Brady's record of TDs in a season but Brady is still 9-4 in head-to-head meetings. Overall, including the playoffs, Manning is just 2-9 on the road against the Pats, 2-7 when facing Brady here. Playing at home, I like Brady and co. to make a statement, that they're still a force in the AFC, one that should not be forgotten about. 10* |
|||||||
11-24-13 | Carolina Panthers v. Miami Dolphins +5 | Top | 20-16 | Win | 100 | 49 h 22 m | Show |
I'm playing on MIAMI. Not many are giving the Dolphins much of a chance here. After all, they're up against Carolina, a red hot team which just beat New England - a team which defeated the Dolphins by double-digits less than a month ago. While I respect the Panthers, I see it differently and believe that anit-Miami sentiment is actually helping to provide us with excellent value.
While many may be down on the Dolphins, keep in mind that they beat San Diego here last week. In their previous home game, they defeated Cincinnati. They've only lost twice here all season and both those setbacks both came by three or fewer points. Also, lets not forget that the Dolphins are still very much alive in the AFC playoff race. At 5-5, they're still only two games behind the Patriots, who are 7-3. The Dolphins know that if they can win today, there's a chance that the Pats will lose, as they're facing Denver. Either way, the Dolphins know that they get to host the Pats in a few weeks - their next home game after this one - and that there will be a lot more meaning to that game, if they can win here. Even if catching the Pats is unrealistic, as it likely is, the Dolphins are still alive in the Wildcard race - IF they can win this week. As Miami tackle Tyson Clabo commented: "We're fighting through this. Someone's got to get that last wild-card spot. Why not us?" While playing without a team's starting center (Pouncey is doubtful as of this writing) is never a good thing, keep in mind that the Dolphins won without Pouncey last week. Remember, Carolina isn't entirely healthy either. Yes, its a big game for the Panthers. Off an emotional/controversial Monday night win, which was preceded by a win on the West Coast (at SF) I believe that they could easily be caught patting themselves on the back a little here. The Panthers have seen each of their last two games decided by four points or less, a 4-point win and a 1-point win. They've played four games which were decided by four or fewer points. Meanwhile, Miami has seen its last three games all decided by four points or less. That makes it six straight Dolphin games which were decided by 10 or fewer points with five of those decided by four or less. I'm grabbing the generous points with what I expect to be a highly motivated home underdog. 10* |
|||||||
11-23-13 | USC v. Colorado +23.5 | Top | 47-29 | Win | 100 | 15 h 29 m | Show |
I'm playing on COLORADO. As indicated by the pointspread of greater than three touchdowns, the visitors have had a much better season. That said, I really like how this one sets up for the home team.
The Buffaloes are playing their final home game of the season. While its been a tough year, they're off a rare win, beating up on Cal by a score of 41-24. That should provide some confidence here. I believe that the Trojans could easily be ripe for a "letdown." They're off a huge win and have just gotten back into the top 25. They've also got rival UCLA on deck. Given those circumstances, it may not be easy to "get up" for lowly Colorado. Including an ATS loss at Hawaii to start the season, the Trojans are 0-3 ATS the last three times that they ere listed as favorites in the 21.5 to 31 range. During that time, they're 3-6 ATS as road favorites, overall. I believe they'll find the going tougher than expected tonight. 10* |
|||||||
11-23-13 | Missouri v. Ole Miss +3 | Top | 24-10 | Loss | -115 | 74 h 12 m | Show |
I'm playing on MISSISSIPPI. The Tigers come in with the higher ranking and as the favorite. While they deserve respect for an excellent season, I'm expecting to see an upset. The Rebels have only lost one game here all season. That was against Texas A&M and the loss came by only three points. They lost by eight at Auburn. Their only other loss - and their only loss by more than eight points - came at Alabama. The Tigers have been tough against the run, but not so much against the pass, I believe that the Rebels have the passing game to take advantage of that weakness. Missouri gives up 274.9 yards per game through the air. Ole Miss quarterback Bo Wallace averages 266.4 passing yards per game. The Tigers get their starting QB (Franklin) back in the starting lineup. Franklin was having an excellent season before he got hurt in the Georgia game, throwing for better than 1500 yards with 14 TD passes against only three INTs. That said, Franklin hasn't started in four games and now he's on the road in what figures to be a very hostile environment. While Pinkel says he "looks great," I won't be surprised to see some effects from the layoff. It should be noted that even if Franklin plays at his best, there can sometimes be a little bit of a letdown from the rest of the team - when a "star" returns. Its not always the "boost" that most assume. Often, players give a little bit extra when the star (or #1 QB) is out, to try and help out the replacement and do their best to win without him. Then, when the star returns, the other players (subconsciously) will "relax," if only slightly. While the Rebels may not be an "upper tier" SEC team, they're still good enough to be ranked in the top 25 in the country overall. In fact, the Rebels have won four straight including a win over LSU - the Tigers were ranked #6 at the time. Last week, the Rebels racked up 751 yards, en route to a 51-21 rout of Troy. While the Trojans admittedly aren't very good, that type of blowout should give the Rebels plenty of confidence here. I'll gladly take whatever points are being offered but as stated earlier, I expect an upset. 10* |
|||||||
11-23-13 | Vanderbilt v. Tennessee -2.5 | Top | 14-10 | Loss | -110 | 73 h 29 m | Show |
I'm playing on TENNESSEE. The Commodores come in as the hotter team. They're also off a big win in last year's game. However, that was at Vanderbilt. The Vols, who are back at home now, have still dominated the rivalry over the years.
While any game in this rivalry is big for both teams, I believe this game will mean more to the Vols. Yes, the Vols have a poor record and are off some bad losses. However, lets keep in mind that this team has played a killer schedule. They've taken on the likes of Oregon, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, Missouri and Auburn. Lets also remember that the Vols beat South Carolina and nearly (should have) beat Georgia. While the Commodores are no slouches, I still believe they represent a step down in class from the recent teams that the Vols have faced. A win here - and a win next week at Kentucky - and the Vols can still become bowl eligible. The Vols should be refreshed, having had last week off. Yes, the Commodores deserve some credit for being Florida. However, lets also keep in mind that they got outgained by a 344-183 margin in that game. This is the final home game for the Vols' senior class. They've had a rough time but can change their history by going out by winning their last two games and becoming bowl eligible. The only previous time that the Vols played with two week's rest in between games this season was when they beat South Carolina. I successfully backed the Vols in that game and I expect Jones to have them ready to go once again. 10* |
|||||||
11-21-13 | Rice v. UAB +19.5 | Top | 37-34 | Win | 100 | 49 h 27 m | Show |
I'm playing on UAB. Recent results have created a very large number for this one. While I respect the Owls, I believe this line is a little too high.
Rice is off a blowout win. However, that was at home. The Owls' last road game resulted in a 28-16 loss. UAB is off back-to-back blowout losses. However, those were both on the road. The Blazers did also lose their last home game. But, that loss came by only a field goal. Their only other home loss came by just 14 points. Rice is 3-3 when playing away from home. Only one of those victories came by greater than six points though. I believe the short turn-around will favor the home team. When asked about playing on a short week, UAB coach Garrick McGee noted: "You lose a couple of days of preparation. In the offseason we spent some time on Rice, using last year |
|||||||
11-20-13 | Northern Illinois v. Toledo +3 | Top | 35-17 | Loss | -115 | 26 h 8 m | Show |
I'm playing on TOLEDO. As you're likely aware, this is a very big game for both of these teams. With a victory, Northern Illinois can clinch at least a share of the Mid-American Conference West Division title. If the Rockets win, however, there would be a 3-way tie, with Ball State.
While the Huskies have dominated this conference in recent years, I believe that Toledo's homefield advantage will prove significant this evening. Northern Illinois coach Carey had this to say of the Glass Bowl: "It's going to be a hostile environment. It's going to be Wednesday. It's going to be a night game. It's an 8:00 p.m. kickoff, so it's going to be cold. I'm sure it's going to be windy |
|||||||
11-17-13 | Kansas City Chiefs v. Denver Broncos -7.5 | Top | 17-27 | Win | 100 | 38 h 36 m | Show |
Analysis before 7am PST Sunday.
|
|||||||
11-17-13 | Oakland Raiders v. Houston Texans -7 | Top | 28-23 | Loss | -115 | 102 h 43 m | Show |
I'm playing on HOUSTON. I'll admit that the Texans have broken my heart (cost me money) this season. That said, I feel this will be a great spot for them to finally "get healthy" with a big win.
Coach Kubiak will be back. When Kubiak was last seen, the Texans were seemingly in good shape for a win against the Colts. After he collapsed, the team did too. They also went on to lose vs. Arizona last week. While he'll be calling plays from the press box, I expect Kubiak's return to provide an emotional boost. Keenum is expected to again get the start. I've liked what I've seen from Keenum and I feel this will be a favorable matchup for him. While the Raiders fared better defensively in last week's loss, the previous week saw them give up 49 points and 414 yards through the air, with Nick Foles throwing for seven TDs. That was the third time the Raiders gave up more than 370 yards through the air this season. The Raiders are winless on the road. They've been outscored by an average of 26.5 to 16.2. Keep in mind that they're a West Coast based team which will be playing an early game in the Eastern Time Zone here. This will be the first time this season that they'll have played back-to-back road games. Last week, they managed a measly 213 total yards. With a banged-up Pryor, rookie Matt McGloin has been getting the snaps in practice and is expected to get the start. I'm not necessarily opposed to playing on a rookie QB making his first start but I'm not yet convinced about McGloin. He's not big and he doesn't have a particularly strong arm. He was only "ok" in college, not good/big enough to get drafted. When he came in against the Eagles, he was just 7/15 for 87 yards. Whether its a banged-up Pryor or McGloin making his first start, the Raiders will be up against a Houston pass defense which allows only 166.6 passing yards per game. That just happens to be the best mark in the entire NFL. (No other AFC team allows less than 200.) In fact, the 280 total yards that the Texans are allowing also ranks #1 in the NFL. On offense, they average 376.2 yards. At home, the Texans are out gaining visiting teams by a commanding 457.7 to 262 margin. They average 6.2 yards per play here, allowing an average of 5.0. Speaking of having a yardage advantage, the Texans dominated the Raiders statistically when these teams met here in 2011. Houston had a 21-11 edge in first downs, a 34:25 to 25:35 edge in time of possession and a 473-278 edge in total yards. Despite also committing nearly twice as many penalties (11/89 vs. 6/50) the Raiders still found a way to win. I don't expect Oakland to be nearly fortunate this time, as I feel the Texans are ready to explode and take their frustrations out on someone. Having blown too many leads, I look for the Texans to keep the pedal to the metal the entire way here, en route to a double-digit win. 10* |
|||||||
11-16-13 | Houston v. Louisville -15 | Top | 13-20 | Loss | -105 | 30 h 27 m | Show |
I'm playing on LOUISVILLE. Both these teams were handed a loss by UCF. In both cases, I was on the Knights. I went against Louisville when the Knights upset them 38-35. I also went against Houston when the Knights defeated them last week. Unfortunately, UCF won but didn't do enough to cover the spread in that one.
In my opinion, one significant difference in the two UCF losses, is that Houston's loss came last week while Louisville has had ample time to "recover." The Cardinals have won their last two games by a combined score of 65-13. While neither team has faced a difficult non-conference schedule, I believe the Cardinals are better on both sides of the ball. Houston averages 38.1 points per game and 470.3 yards. The Cougars average 6.3 yards per play. On the road, the number of points dips to 35. Louisville averages 38.4 ppg and 481.2 ypg. The Cardinals average 7.3 yards per play. At home, all the numbers improve with the points per game improving to an impressive 44.8. Its on the defensive side of the ball where the Cards really have the the advantage though. Houston allows 22 points and 426.7 yards per game. Louisville, on the other hand, allows 10.6 points per game and 244 yards. I expect the Cards, who have had an extra day's rest, to make a statement. 10* |
|||||||
11-16-13 | Georgia +4 v. Auburn | Top | 38-43 | Loss | -115 | 33 h 5 m | Show |
I'm playing on GEORGIA. This is the oldest rivalry in the south and after all the years (116) of playing each other, the series is tied 54-54-8. There's no denying that Auburn has been much better against the point spread than Georgia this season. The Tigers also have a better SU record than the Bulldogs. That said, I'm not convinced that they're the better squad.
While the Bulldogs went through a bit of a tough spell in October, they're back on track now. They've dealt with some major injuries this season, something that has been an ongoing issue. Still, they're starting to get a few guys back and they're still loaded. Last week's 45-6 blowout of Appalachian State figures to have them full of confidence. True, Auburn handled Tennessee more easily than Georgia did. However, lets not forget that Georgia defeated LSU, a team which handed Auburn its lone loss. While both offenses have proven to be potent, I believe the Bulldogs have been a little better defensively. They're allowing 367 yards per game, compared to Auburn's 394.4 per game. Georgia holds opponents to 5.2 yards per play, just 4.2 its last three games. Auburn allows 5.5 yards per play. While the differences may not seem all that significant, keep in mind that Georgia has had to face Clemson, South Carolina, Missouri, Vanderbilt and Florida. Auburn has had to face Texas A@M and Ole Miss. (As noted, both also faced LSU and Tennessee.) So, the Bulldogs have arguably faced a greater number of high quality opponents. The Tigers have admittedly been an excellent running team. The Bulldogs have been tough against the rush though. Only South Carolina gained more than 200 yards against them on the ground. Overall, they rank 4th in the SEC against the run. I believe the Tigers will be forced to throw more often than they normally like to and that may lead to some mistakes. The Bulldogs, who have won 11 straight November games, have played five games which were decided by four or fewer points, four of those decided by a field goal. I believe that all the Bulldogs' "big" and "close" game experience will serve them well here. I'll take the points but I look for Georgia to score the "upset," killing any thoughts Auburn fans may have had about beating Alabama and sneaking into the title game. *10 |
|||||||
11-14-13 | Indianapolis Colts v. Tennessee Titans +3 | Top | 30-27 | Push | 0 | 37 h 10 m | Show |
I'm playing on TENNESSEE. Both teams are off embarrassing performances last week. The Colts were destroyed by St. Louis. The Titans lost to the previously winless Jaguars, a team some had been calling the worst ever. Needless to say, both will be looking to bounce back with a much better performance. While I'm aware that Luck has a pretty impressive track record off a loss, I feel it will be the Titans which wind up with the money Thursday.
True, the Titans are without Locker. However, Fitzpatrick has some starts under his belt and the fact that he'll be starting here isn't coming as a surprise. He knows this is his chance and I expect him to be ready to go. I also expect the rest of the team to rally around him. As tight end Delanie Walker noted of Fitzpatrick. "He's going to be the starting quarterback from now on because Jake is out for the year, so Ryan has no choice but to play (well). I feel like he did a great job against the Jaguars. This is his opportunity to be the man now." While the Colts swept last season's meetings, the game here went to OT, while the game at Indianapolis was decided by four points, the Colts erasing a double-digit lead. In other words, both games could have easily gone either way. The Titans know that, after this, they only play one more home game between now and Christmas. And that doesn't come until 12/15. Their next three come on the road, one of them at Indianapolis. Knowing all that - and that a loss here essentially kills any hope of the playoffs - makes taking care of business on Thursday that much more imperative. Obviously the Colts also want to bounce back with a win. However, they don't "need" to in the same way that the Titans do. While Locker's absence will grab all the headlines, the Colts' injury list is much longer than the Titans' list, headed by star receiver Reggie Wayne. Playing arguably their biggest game of the entire season, I look for the Titans to rise to the occasion and score the upset. 10* |
|||||||
11-13-13 | Ball State +7.5 v. Northern Illinois | Top | 27-48 | Loss | -105 | 13 h 42 m | Show |
I'm playing on BALL STATE. There have been some big games in the MAC Conference recently but this is arguably the biggest of the bunch. Northern Illinois is undefeated, ranked nationally, looking to take complete command of the MAC, and make a return to a BCS bowl game. Ball State is 9-1 on the season, 7-0 its last seven, looking to spoil the Huskies' dreams and win the MAC.
The game is so big that Michigan coach Brady Hoke and ESPN writer Jason Whitlock, both of whom attended Ball State, kicked in $10,000 to help bus Cardinals' students to attend. Boasting the longest home winning streak in the nation and led by a star QB, the Huskies are certainly worthy of respect. That said, the Cardinals have also proven to be worthy of respect. Indeed, they've won 15 of their last 16 regular season games. While they deserve some credit for beating a pair of Big Ten teams at the beginning of the season, keep in mind that those two teams (Iowa and Purdue) are currently a combined 7-12, 3-8 in Big-Ten play. So, it wasn't like they beat an "elite" Big-Ten team. Beating Eastern Illinois could be considered an "accomplishment" but keep in mind that the Huskies did so by only four points. Ball State has beaten a solid Toledo team, arguably a more impressive "conference" win than Northern Illinois has to its credit. The Cardinals also visited Virginia and hammered the Cavaliers by a 48-27 score. True, the Cavs are having a bad year - and are at the bottom of the ACC. Still, they're comparable to Purdue, a team in the same situation in the Big-Ten, that NIU beat by a similar score. While the Huskies have had some extra time to prepare, they're only 2-3 ATS their last five off a bye. Arguably this season's worst performance, an 8-point win against Idaho as a huge favorite, came when they played with extra rest. On the other hand, Ball State is 12-3 ATS its last 15 off a conference win. Last night's two MAC contests were both out of hand by halftime. I look for this one to be far more closely contested and am grabbing the generous points. 10* |
|||||||
11-11-13 | Miami Dolphins v. Tampa Bay Buccaneers +3 | Top | 19-22 | Win | 100 | 156 h 11 m | Show |
I'm playing on TAMPA BAY. I won with the Dolphins last week. However, I'm going against them here.
I expect the Bucs to be both desperate and extremely motivated. They desperately want their first victory of the season - and a chance to do so on Monday night should provide them with added incentive to give it everything they've got. The Bucs ultimately came up short but they played a great game at Seattle last week. They've been very competitive, nearly every week - and this game provides them with an excellent shot to finally break through with a win. Lets not forget that the Dolphins are still 1-4 their last five games, the lone win coming by two points, on a safety. They've lost their last two on the road by a combined score of 65-34. Obviously, Miami badly wants a win too. Monday night games are big for every team, regardless of the situation. Plus, at 4-4, the Dolphins aren't out of the playoff race yet. That said, the Dolphins have some wins under their belts and are on the road. They may not have the same level of desperation as their hosts. While the Dolphins are trying to use it as an "us against the world" rallying cry, I do believe that the Incognito issue could easily prove to be a distraction. Either way, I look for homefield to prove the difference, as the Bucs finally find a way. 10* |
|||||||
11-10-13 | Dallas Cowboys v. New Orleans Saints -6.5 | Top | 17-49 | Win | 100 | 155 h 52 m | Show |
I'm playing on the NEW ORLEANS SAINTS. Long-time regulars will recall that I rode the Saints pretty hard during the year that they won the Super Bowl. Not only did I go 2-0 in the big game, hitting side and total, I backed them in every one of their playoff covers. While I obviously didn't play on them every week during the regular season, I was perfect in their 'prime-time" games. (If memory serves me correctly, they hammered the Giants, Patriots and Falcons all on National TV that reg. season.) That year's team had a real tendency to elevate its play on the "big stage." While I won't hand them the SB title quite yet, I believe this year's team has the same "feeling" to it. I believe that they'll be "extra motivated" for this game and that they'll prove too much for the Cowboys to handle.
I noted the same thing (about their tendency to elevate in big games and comparing this year's team to the SB team) when I backed the Saints in their Monday night game against Miami. They won that one with ease. Before I continue singing the Saints' praises, note that I will play against them (or any team) when the situation warrants doing so. I successfully played against the Saints when the Bucs nearly upset them earlier this season. However, that was on the road and there were a number of reasons why I thought they'd struggle. They're an entirely different team at home. Indeed, in four home games the Saints are a perfect 4-0 SU/ATS, outscoring opponents by an average of 31.7 to 14.5. They've averaged 423.2 yards per game here, 6.6 yards per play. Visiting teams are only averaging 311 yards. Going back further finds the Saints at a commanding 16-4 SU/ATS their last 20 games here. I like and respect the Cowboys and believe that they've a very capable team. While I did successfully play against them last week, I've also won with them on more than one occasion this season, successfully backing them vs. both the Manning brothers. Those games were both at Dallas though, while this one's at New Orleans. Not only are the Saints extremely tough to beat here, but the Cowboys have only one road win in four tries this season. They're getting out gained by an average of 430 yards to 317.7 in those four road games. They give up 6.2 yards per play on the road, averaging only 5.3 themselves. Note that the Cowboys were out gained by a 623-268 margin at Detroit, the last time they played in a dome. They earned a fortunate cover in that one - but are up against a more dangerous opponent here. Brees remains one of the very best quarterbacks in the game. He's got a tight-end (Jimmy Graham) who's practically unstoppable. After finding the end zone twice last week, Graham now has 10 TDs on the season. Overall, he caught nine passes for better than 100 yards. Note that Brees threw for 446 yards and three TDs the last time he faced the Cowboys. That game, which was played at Dallas last December and when Sean Payton wasn't the coach, was close. New Orleans, which was the underdog, won by a score of 34-31 in OT. A closer look at the stats shows that the Saints actually had a major edge on the ground (116-40) and that they had a 33-18 advantage in first downs, to go along with a whopping 41:59 to 22.28 edge in time of possession. Speaking of the Saints' coach, I believe that Payton, who was with Dallas before coming here, is among the very best in the game. I believe he gives the Saints an edge over Jason Garrett. Payton's defensive coordinator, Rob Ryan, isn't doing too shabby a job either. Indeed, Ryan has helped transform the Saints into one of the league's better defenses. As noted, they're allowing a mere 14.5 points per game here. While Romo had a big game vs. the Saints at Dallas last season, Ryan's unit is much better against the pass this year than last. The Saints rank fifth in the league against the pass, giving up 211 yards per game through the air. Note that Ryan figures to take this game personally. He was fired by the Cowboys last January, Garrett informing him of the decision by phone. Saints cornerback Keenan Lewis said this of Ryan: ''Any time a guy gets fired from a spot he's at and he has an opportunity to play them, he wants to prove a point.'' I expect the Saints entire team to be extra "fired up" to help Ryan "prove his point." The Saints, who have scored 20 or more points in seven of eight games, have allowed 18 points or less six times on the season. They've beaten the Cowboys seven of the last eight meetings and they're 9-1 ATS the last 10 times that they were home favorites in the 3.5 to 7 range. I expect them to make a statement. 10* |
|||||||
11-10-13 | Philadelphia Eagles v. Green Bay Packers -1 | Top | 27-13 | Loss | -110 | 99 h 8 m | Show |
I'm playing on GREEN BAY. As you're likely aware, Rodgers is out. That's obviously significant; Rodgers is one of the best QBs in the game, arguably the most valuable. Naturally, its been reflected in the line. With Rodgers in the game, the Packers are fairly heavy favorites here. Without him, that's not the case. In fact, without him, many aren't giving the Packers much of a chance at all. While I also think Rodgers is great, I believe that sentiment is providing us with plenty of value on the Pack.
While I'd never want anyone to get hurt, I benefitted from Rodgers' injury last week, as I had the Bears. Like others that watched the game, I saw that Seneca Wallace did not perform well. In fact, he wasn't very good at all. Since that performance, I've heard a lot of talk about how Wallace doesn't deserve to be an NFL QB and how the Packers have no chance with him in there. I've followed Wallace's career though and I expect him to be much better this week. While his career stats are not good, he's had some tough situations. He's had a week to prepare and is no longer coming in cold. He's also heard all the talk about how terrible he is and figures to be extremely motivated to prove otherwise. I look for him to do so. The Packers are a very well-coached team. I expect McCarthy and co. to find ways to help make Wallace effective. Of course, having a potent rushing attack, as the Packers have had, figures to help Wallace. Lacey and co. will be up against a Philadelphia defense which surrendered 210 rushing yards, on 33 carries, vs. Oakland last week. Foles is coming off a rather incredible performance. However, just as I won't over-react to Wallace's sub-par performance, I'm not about to immediately call Foles "elite." On the defensive side of the ball, keep in mind that the Packers allow 17.2 points and 341 yards per game at home, the Eagles allow 28 points and 429.6 yards per game on the road. Lets not forget that the Packers have won 29 of their last 31 regular-season games here at Lambeau. Or, that they're 16-4 all-time vs. the Eagles here. Don't be shocked when McCarthy and co. to find a way to continue that dominance Sunday afternoon. 10* |
|||||||
11-09-13 | Tulane v. Texas San Antonio -7.5 | Top | 7-10 | Loss | -108 | 124 h 23 m | Show |
I'm playing on TEXAS SAN ANTONIO. Tulane comes in with the superior record. However, I believe that UTSA is favored for good reason.
The Roadrunners have hit their stride in recent weeks. Last time out, they went on the road and hammered Tulsa by a 34-15 score. In their previous game, they beat UAB by a score of 52-31. On the other hand, after a number of consecutive upsets, the Green Wave came back down to earth last week, a 34-17 loss at FAU. Give the Green Wave credit. They've already exceeded expectations. However, lets keep in mind that they average less than 300 yards of offense per game, surrendering nearly 400. Conversely, after the last two weeks, the Roadrunners are now out gaining opponents on the season, albeit not by a much. They're averaging 418.4 yards of offense per game and that number climbs all the way to 488.5 at home. While the Green Wave average 4.2 yards per play on the road, the Roadrunners average 6.4 yards per play at home. UTSA's Eric Soza, a senior, does an excellent job of spreading the ball around and ranks among the top QBs in the conference. He's already thrown for 1991 yards and 11 TDs, completing better than 63% of his passes. Running back David Glasco II is off a big game, giving him 494 yards and two TDs on the season. Meanwhile, the defense is off arguably its best game of the season. The Roadrunners haven't been around that long, so they haven't been favored that often. They are 5-1 ATS the past few seasons when laying points though. This is a big game for them and I believe their superior offense will ultimately lead to a double-digit win. 10* |
|||||||
11-07-13 | Oregon v. Stanford +10.5 | Top | 20-26 | Win | 100 | 87 h 9 m | Show |
I'm playing on STANFORD. Needless to say, this is a huge game. The Ducks, who are looking to avenge last year's 17-14 loss, are 8-0 on the season. They've got the Pac-12 Championship and a spot in the BCS title game in mind. Don't think that Stanford players want it any less though.
How big is this game? The winner of this matchup has won the Pac-12 title each of the past three years. The loser was handed its only regular-season loss. Had those games gone the other way, the loser would have likely played in the BCS championship game. Yes, the Ducks are again a scary team. However, et's not forget that Stanford has won 13 straight home games since losing 53-30 (to Oregon) in 2011. When talking about this game earlier in the week to a couple of long-time friends, I compared the Ducks to Mike Tyson. I noted that most fighters were so intimidated by Tyson that they'd lost before they even stepped in the ring. But, that as dangerous/dominant a fighter as he was, if someone (like Holyfield) wasn't afraid of him - and was actually willing to bully him back - that he was potentially beatable. (Both have been friends long enough to remember/know that, although I was still young, I bet Holyfield in both Tyson fights - so the analogy had a personal connection.) Anyway, as much as I respect Oregon, I have a feeling that Stanford is its Holyfield. The Cardinal aren't intimidated. Unlike other Oregon opponents, the Cardinal actually believe that they're going to win this game. True, they haven't necessarily been as dominant against their opponents as Oregon has. (That was also true of Holyfield.) However, the lone loss came on the road (by only six) and I believe that some of the close games they've played will serve the Cardinal well here. While the Cardinal did lose defensive end Ben Gardner last game, this is still another very solid Stanford defense, one which is rounding into form. The Cardinal allowed just 10 and 12 points their last two games. While the Ducks are admittedly also very good as favorites, note that Stanford is a perfect 4-0 ATS as an underdog the past couple of seasons. Two outright wins and two losses by a touchdown or less. Going back further shows that they're 7-1 ATS as underdogs, dating back to an upset of the Ducks here in 2009. Last year's game went to OT. I expect another close one and am grabbing all the points I can get. 10* |
|||||||
11-07-13 | Oklahoma +14.5 v. Baylor | Top | 12-41 | Loss | -110 | 86 h 38 m | Show |
I'm playing on OKLAHOMA. I've successfully played against both these teams this season. In fact, I did so on the same day. I went against the Bears when they failed to cover vs. K-State. And, I went against the Sooners when they got whipped by Texas. In both cases, I felt the line was too high. I feel the same way here.
Baylor has indeed been good. Scary good. With the exception of the K-State game, they're dominated every other time they've taken the field. However, lets keep in mind that the schedule has been very weak. This is by far the Bears' toughest opponent yet. The Bears did beat the Sooners here in 2011. However, that win came by only seven points and it was the only time that Baylor has won in this series in recent memory. The Bears' schedule gets a lot tougher, starting here. Even coach Briles noted that as far as he was concerned, the season was just getting started. He was quoted saying: "We are anxious to get into the grind time." While I respect the Bears, I believe Briles needs to be careful what he wishes for - and am grabbing all those generous points. 10* |
|||||||
11-04-13 | Chicago Bears +11 v. Green Bay Packers | Top | 27-20 | Win | 100 | 36 h 30 m | Show |
I'm playing on CHICAGO. Without Cutler, not many are giving the Bears much of a chance against the mighty Packers. I also respect Green Bay. The Packers are very well-coached and have an outstanding quarterback. That doesn't mean that they can't be beaten though - or at least seriously challenged. Facing a desperate Chicago team, I expect the Packers to have their hands full Monday night.
Obviously, playing without Cutler is not ideal. However, McCown is a veteran and I expect him to give everything he's got.. He's been with the team for some time.. He's been here before, throwing for 242 years at Lambeau on Christmas Day 2011. He's off an impressive "relief" performance, hitting 70% (14 of 20) of his passes at Washington, for better than 200 yards with a TD, while also running for 33 more. McCown will have benefitted from the bye week, getting extra time to work with the first team. He's got plenty of weapons, with the likes of Forte, Marshall, Jeffery and Bennett. He knows this is his chance - and I expect him to do everything he can to make the most of it. Cutler said this of his backup: "Josh is going to do the job. We've got a good game plan coming in. Josh fared well against Washington. He'll play well again this week." Its also true that the Bears defense is banged-up, arguably a bigger concern than the QB situation. The defense should have also benefitted from the extra week off though. The defensive players too know this is their opportunity and that the team badly needs them to elevate their play. Lets not forget that the Packers have significant injury issues of their own. Lets also not forget that the Bears haven't lost a game by more than eight points this entire season or that the Packers have seen five of seven games decided by 13 or less. Chicago coach Marc Trestman had this to say: "We really have to play together more than ever now. And I think that's something that we're capable of doing." While the Packers have generally finished on top, the Bears almost always play them tough. Eight of the past 10 meetings have been decided by 10 point or less and all 10 of those games were decided by 14 or less. I expect that to be the case again and am grabbing all the points I can get. 10* |
|||||||
11-03-13 | Indianapolis Colts v. Houston Texans +1.5 | Top | 27-24 | Loss | -110 | 152 h 30 m | Show |
I'm playing on HOUSTON. I've had success playing both on and against the Colts this season. I feel that this will be a good spot to go against them.
While they couldn't quite manage the outright victory, the Texans broke through with a cover last time out, losing by a single point at KC, vs. the undefeated Chiefs. The Texans know they basically need to win every game the rest of the way, if they want any shot at making the playoffs. Even if they don't believe that's really possible, I believe that they'll be treating this game very seriously, doing everything possible to earn a win. After all, this is a divisional game on National TV. It offers a chance to show the world that they're a lot better than their record indicates. With victories over the Broncos and also at San Francisco, the Colts have proven that they can beat any team in the league. However, they did lose their last road game (19-9 at SD) and I believe that this will be a tough venue. Not having Reggie Wayne doesn't figure to help matters. For all this season's troubles, the Texans are still outgaining opposing teams by an average margin of 449.3 to 244.7 in their three games here at Houston. (Somehow, they only managed to win one of those, covering none.) Note that the home team won both meetings by double-digits in this series last season. The Colts beat the Texans 28-16 at Indianapolis. However, the Texans beat the Colts 29-17 in the game here at Houston. Keenum is expected to get the call and his performance seemed to light a spark for the team, particularly in terms of the deep passing game. According to ESPN Stats & Information, Keenum completed three of five pass attempts longer than 20 yards. In the previous four weeks, the Texans had attempted only six such passes total. Keenum finished with a passer rating of 110.6, completing 15 of 25 passes for 271 yards and a touchdown. Keep in mind that those numbers came against the Chiefs, arguably this season's best defensive team through the first half of the season. With the calendar having flipped, note that the Texans are a perfect 7-0 SU (5-1-1 ATS) in the month of November, the past coupe of seasons. I expect their best effort, en route to another ATS win. 10* |
|||||||
11-02-13 | Auburn v. Arkansas +8 | Top | 35-17 | Loss | -110 | 28 h 18 m | Show |
I'm playing on ARKANSAS. I've only played on the Razorbacks once this season. That was when they covered vs. Texas A&M back on 9/28. Its a good thing that I've avoided them in their other games, as that cover has been sandwiched by six straight ATS losses, three on either side. I believe that those poor ATS results, combined with Auburn's really good recent ATS stats, have worked in our favor here - and that we're getting very fair line value.
As mentioned, the Razorbacks are reeling a little., having failed to cover three straight. However, those three games came against the likes of Florida, South Carolina and Alabama - and two of the three came on the road. (Note that this is their Razorbacks 5th straight game against a ranked opponent, the longest stretch of an SEC team in more than 20 years.) They've since had a bye, allowing extra preparation time for this game and time to lick their wounds and regroup in time for the final stretch. I believe that the bye came at the perfect time and I expect to see a refreshed and re-energized team. Arkansas head coach Brett Bielema said this of today's game: "It's obviously a big game for us. There's a lot that goes into it. They're a team that's ranked, a team that's done some good things. Obviously an opportunity to be here at home on what should be close to a sell-out crowd, an evening game that everyone should be jacked up for. It will be a tremendous environment." The Tigers are indeed on quite a roll. While they definitely deserve credit for beating Texas A&M, lets keep in mind that they won that one by only four points. (Not enough to cover here.) Their other wins have largely come against mediocre or weak opposition. I believe that they're a good team - but probably not as good as their lofty national ranking suggests. Note that the Tigers' starting QB is expected to play, but that he's a bit "sore" and banged-up. Their only other road game was a double-digit loss. Even with the win over the Aggies, the Tigers are still only 2-9 SU and 4-7 ATS on the road the past couple of seasons. They were 2-5 ATS the past two Novembers and they're 0-2 ATS the past two times that they were favored in the 3.5 to 10 range. The Razorbacks won by 17 at Auburn last season and they beat the Tigers by 24 here the previous season. I expect them to come in both confident and motivated and I expect at least a cover. 10* |
|||||||
11-02-13 | Wake Forest v. Syracuse -3 | Top | 0-13 | Win | 100 | 120 h 34 m | Show |
I'm playing on SYRACUSE. I won with the Demon Deacons a few weeks back. Listed as underdogs, they upset NC State. That was the start of three straight ATS victories. This week, however, I feel that the value has shifted the other way.
Syracuse is 2-1 at home. The Orange have outscored teams by a 40 to 22 average margin here, outgaining them by an average of 465.7 to 347. While the victories did come again weak opposition, this can still be a difficult place to play. Wake Forest is 1-3 on the road. The Deacons are getting outscored by an average of 28.7 to 15.7 in those four games, outgained by a 408.7 to 297.2 margin. Going back a bit further finds that Wake Forest is only 4-10 (SU) its last 14 road games while Syracuse is 10-5 its last 15 home. The Orange were embarrassed last time out, losing 56-0 at Georgia Tech. That debacle should provide them with some added motivation here. Note that they've since had an extra week off to recover and prepare. The Deacons were much more competitive in losing their last game. In fact, they lost by only three points at Miami. Give them credit for playing the Hurricanes tough. However, after leaving everything on the field at Miami and losing in the final minute, they're now playing their second road game in two weeks. The previous time that they were in that situation (2nd of b2b road games) this season, they lost by a score of 56-7. While the Deacons will be trying to get coach Grobe his school record 78th victory, I believe last week's loss while have a lingering effect. These teams last met in 2011. The Orange won that meeting by seven points. The Orange know that if they want to make it to a bowl game, this is a game they desperately need. I expect another win and cover. 10* |
|||||||
10-28-13 | Seattle Seahawks v. St Louis Rams +12 | Top | 14-9 | Win | 100 | 56 h 1 m | Show |
I'm playing on ST. LOUIS. Without starting QB Sam Bradford, not many are giving the Rams much of a chance here. I believe that they're offering us excellent value.
Keep in mind that the Seahawks have only won one of their four road games by more than five points. They beat Arizona by 12 last time out. However, before that, they'd lost by six at Indianapolis, won by three at Houston and won by five at Carolina. Bradford had been playing well of late. So, losing him certainly wasn't a "good" thing. However, I'm not as down on Clemens as many others seem to be. Clemens, who worked with offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer during his tenure with the Jets, knows this is his big opportunity. He's been Bradford's backup for a couple of years and has been in the league a lot longer than that. Clemens noted: "...I'll go out there and do the best job I can and try to help this team win some games." As impressive as Wilson's career has been, he didn't fare well here last season. In fact, he was picked off three times here, only one of two times that he's been intercepted more than once in the same game. Note that he'll still be without Percy Harvin here, as Carroll has indicated the star receiver won't play. St. Louis won that game by a score of 19-13, while losing the game at Seattle by seven points. The Rams are 2-0 ATS the past couple of seasons, when listed as home underdogs in the 10.5 to 14 range. They've won two of their last three and I expect their very best effort on Monday night. 10* |
|||||||
10-27-13 | Green Bay Packers v. Minnesota Vikings +10 | Top | 44-31 | Loss | -110 | 123 h 8 m | Show |
I'm playing on MINNESOTA. Off a poor performance on National TV last week, not many bettors are going to want to back the Vikings here. Not against the mighty Packers. I feel that sentiment is providing us with excellent value with the home underdog.
The Packers are 0-2-1 ATS away from Lambeau this season. They lost two of those games outright while winning the other by just two points. While they've admittedly struggled the last two weeks, the Vikings first four games were all decided by 10 or fewer points; three losses by 10 or less and a win by seven. With the playoffs no longer even worth dreaming about, a home game on National TV, vs. a division rival, is about as big as it gets for the Vikings. I expect them to treat it like a "very important game." On the other hand, the Packers have many bigger games still to play, including a big one next week vs. arch-rival Chicago, a team they're fighting with the for the division lead. The Vikings are 25-14-1 ATS (31-9 SU) the last 40 times that they played a home game with an O/U line in the 45.5 to 49 range, 3-1 ATS the last couple of seasons. During that time, the Packers are 1-5-1 ATS when playing a road game with an O/U line in that range. While they lost by 14 at Lambeau in January, the Vikings won last year's game here at Minnesota by three points, losing by nine at Lambeau. The Vikings are 14-9-2 ATS the last 25 times that they were getting points. During that time, they're 7-4 ATS off two or more consecutive losses. I expect their best effort to lead to at least another cover on Sunday night. 10* |
|||||||
10-26-13 | Texas v. TCU -2 | Top | 30-7 | Loss | -110 | 29 h 50 m | Show |
I'm playing on TCU. I backed the Longhorns in their win over Oklahoma. However, I'm going against them here.
Although the Frogs have had some trouble on the road, they're 3-0 at home. They've outscored visiting teams by an average score of 37.7 to 17. The well-coached Frogs are 5-2 SU the last seven times that they were off a conference loss, covering the spread in four of those. During that time, Texas is only 4-7 ATS off a conference win. While they've had some time off, I believe the Longhorns may still be patting themselves on the back for finally beating the Sooners. Even Mack Brown admitted that his Longhorns were feeling "..really full of themselves." Both teams can run the ball. However, TCU is better at stopping the run. (The Frogs lead the Big 12 in rushing defense, allowing opponents to average just 115.3 yards on the ground.) In last year's game at Texas, the Frogs had a 217-86 edge on the ground, en route to a 20-13 win. I look for them to have the advantage once again. 10* |
|||||||
10-26-13 | Utah v. USC -6.5 | Top | 3-19 | Win | 100 | 25 h 21 m | Show |
I'm playing on USC. The Trojans are 2-0 against the Utes since Utah joined the Pac-12. Going back further finds USC at 8-3 all-time in this series. I expect the Trojans to continue that dominance Saturday afternoon.
Its true that the Trojans are dealing with some injury issues and that they're off a loss. Keep in mind this team is still 3-0 its last three home games though, beating Arizona, Utah State and Boston College by a combined score of 90-52. The Utes, who were hit hard by personnel losses in the offseason, are also dealing with some injuries. They're off a double-digit loss at Arizona and playing the second of back-to-back road games for the first time this season. QB Wilson is expected to start but may still be at less than 100%. The Trojans won by 10 at Utah last season and they beat the Utes by nine the previous season. Even with all their current issues, I still believe that they're the strong team and I look for them to win by more than a TD once again. 10* |
|||||||
10-26-13 | Houston v. Rutgers -6.5 | Top | 49-14 | Loss | -110 | 21 h 23 m | Show |
I'm playing on RUTGERS. I successfully played on the "under" the last time that the Knights took the field, a 24-10 loss at Lousville a couple of weeks back. In their previous game, I successfully played against the Knights, a 3-pt win vs. SMU. This week, however, I feel that the Knights have the situation in their favor.
Houston has been a spread-covering machine this season. However, the Cougars saw their dreams of an undefeated season go up in smoke last week, losing by a single point (47-46) vs. BYU. That figures to be a tough pill to swallow; I won't be surprised if they're a little deflated here. Rutgers is 5-1 SU (4-1 ATS) its last six off a bye. During that stretch, the Knights are 5-2 ATS as home favorites in the 3.5 to 10 range. While the Cougars can certainly put points on the board, I believe the Knights have a little more overall talent. Throw in the home field and situational advantages and I expect the Knights to pull away with a double-digit win. 10* |
|||||||
10-24-13 | Carolina Panthers v. Tampa Bay Buccaneers +7 | Top | 31-13 | Loss | -130 | 51 h 4 m | Show |
I'm playing on TAMPA BAY. With an 0-6 record not too many people are going to want to back the Bucs here. I believe that sentiment is providing us with very fair value on what I expect to be a highly determined home underdog.
I believe that the Bucs will really want this game. Coach Schiano had this to say: ''I want to be clear on this because I don't take lightly 0-6. I've never been 0-6. But we do our best. We're trying our hardest. Our guys are working ... and I have found when you have good people and they work hard and they work smart it'll turn. That's what I believe." Last year's games between these two clubs were both decided by six points. The Bucs won 16-10 at Tampa in September and then they won 27-21 at Carolina in November. This year's Tampa games have also been close, for the most part. An eight-point loss at Atlanta last time out was their fourth loss of eight or fewer points, three of those coming by three or less. While they're 0-3 at home, the Bucs have actually been leading their home games by an average score of 11.3 to 8.0 at halftime. Overall, they're being outscored by an average of 5.3 points per game here. Carolina linebacker Thomas Davis correctly stated: "In this league anything is possible and we know what Tampa Bay is capable of. If you look at their games this year they've pretty much been in all of those games. It just came down to executing in the fourth quarter and they could have a much different record. We know that." The Panthers are 0-2 ATS the past couple of seasons as road favorites in the 3.5 to 7 range. I expect them to have their hands full the entire way and am grabbing all the points I can get. 9* |
|||||||
10-24-13 | Kentucky +10.5 v. Mississippi State | Top | 22-28 | Win | 100 | 50 h 5 m | Show |
I'm playing on KENTUCKY. The Wildcats were blown out in their last game. However, that was vs. Alabama and it was the only time that it was their fourth straight very difficult game in a row. Prior to facing Alabama, they'd faced Louisville, Florida and South Carolina. They were mostly competitive in each of those games, including losing by just seven at South Carolina. I successfully backed the Cats in their cover at South Carolina and I look for them to again be far more competitive than most will be expecting.
The Bulldogs have beaten Kentucky four straight times, defeating them in Rich Brooks' last season and each of Joker Phillips' three. The Cats have a new coach (Stoops) now though and I do believe that they're an improved team. Note that these teams have played each other every year during that time and that neither team has won more than three straight in the series since 1990. The Bulldogs are 3-3 on the season. The did blow out Troy and Alcorn State but when facing quality teams have come up short. Against Bowling Green, their most recent game, they won by only one. While the Bulldogs certainly aren't slouches, they aren't quite as good as some of the teams which Kentucky has encountered recently. I believe all those games against elite opponents will serve the Cats well here, as they step down in class. I expect them to serve notice that they're no longer going to be push-overs in this rivalry, going all out for their first SEC win and earning AT LEAST a cover along the way. 10* |
|||||||
10-21-13 | Minnesota Vikings +3.5 v. NY Giants | Top | 7-23 | Loss | -105 | 13 h 43 m | Show |
I'm playing on MINNESOTA. Needless to say, this wasn't the season that either of these teams had hoped for. Nor was it the matchup that ESPN envisioned. However, its still an interesting storyline, one which I believe is offering us excellent value.
When teams underachieve the way these ones have, homefield can often be less advantageous than normal. The crowd can be a little less into it from the onset and it can be quick to turn on the home team, if/when things don't go as planned. Even though the chances of making the playoffs are now extremely remote for both teams, there should be no shortage of motivation. Both teams have pride, both want to get things turned around. Both would love to show the national audience that they're better than their record indicates. The QBs, in particular, both figure to have much to prove. While he obviously didn't fare too well in Tampa, I believe Freeman will provide a boost for the Vikings. The Giants may have looked a little better than the Vikings in their most recent game but overall, the Vikings have been far more competitive. The Vikings are being outscored on the road, but only by a 30.7 to 29.3 average margin. On the other hand, the Giants are being outscored by a 38.5 to 22.2 average margin at home. The Giants 9-13 ATS as favorites the past couple of seasons are 1-2 ATS on Monday nights the past couple of seasons. The Vikings are 2-1 ATS as underdogs this season, 14-8-2 ATS as underdogs the past couple of seasons. I'm taking the points. 10* |
|||||||
10-20-13 | Denver Broncos v. Indianapolis Colts +7 | Top | 33-39 | Win | 100 | 108 h 27 m | Show |
I'm playing on INDIANAPOLIS. Some will surely believe that I need to have my head checked for going against Manning in his return to Indianapolis. That's OK. They thought that each of the past two weeks when I went against the Broncos too.. Denver failed to cover in either of those games. Once again. I feel that the value lies in going against the Broncos.
I've had pretty good success in picking my spots to play on/against the Colts. Last week, I successfully played against them, when they lost at San Diego. Included in my reasons for playing against them was the fact that they were on the road and that they might be caught looking ahead to this week's big game. Prior to that, I'd also successfully played against the Colts in their opening week ATS loss vs. Oakland. And, I successfully played ON the Colts when they crushed the 49'ers, a result that shows they can beat elite teams. Keep in mind that prior to last week's loss, the Colts had won three straight. After their previous loss, they won their next two games by a combined score of 64-10. While Mannning will obviously want to play his best and to win, the Colts should be every bit as determined to avoid letting that happen. While he admittedly seems to have ice water in his veins at times, it still figures to be an emotional homecoming for Peyton and its only natural to be at least a little nervous. Note that he was somewhat mortal in the game against Jacksonville, too. (Threw for less than 300 yards, had passer rating of less than 100, got picked off etc.) It should also be noted that Manning is without All Pro left tackle Ryan Clady and that right tackle Orlando Franklin got banged-up in the Jacksonville. Even if he plays, he may be at less than 100%. The Colts, who allow just 16.3 points per game, are 4-1 ATS the last five times that they were listed as home underdogs in the 3.5 to 7 range. This is a huge game for them and I expect their best effort, en route to AT LEAST another cover. 10* |
|||||||
10-20-13 | San Francisco 49ers v. Tennessee Titans +4.5 | Top | 31-17 | Loss | -110 | 104 h 60 m | Show |
I'm playing on TENNESSEE. While I certainly respect the 49'ers, I like how this sets up for the Titans.
For starters, the Titans are expected to have Locker back at QB. That figures to help, as the offense had really struggled under Fitzpatrick the past couple of seasons. Off three straight double-digit wins, I believe that the 49'ers could easily get caught patting themselves on the back a little here. It should be easy to take a struggling non-conf. opponent like Tennessee lightly, particularly with a trip to London on deck. Keep in mind that the Titans still have a winning record at home, where they're outgaining opposing teams by a 371-320 margin. While every game is certainly important to the 49ers, who are batting with Seattle for the division lead, the 49'ers do have some very winnable games on deck and even if they didn't ultimately beat Seattle, they'd still be in a solid spot for the Wildcard, even if they lost here. I would argue its a bigger game for the Titans, who would fall below .500 with a loss. The Titans, who have a long history of ATS success vs. NFC teams, are already 3-1 ATS as underdogs this season. I expect at least another cover. 10* |
|||||||
10-19-13 | Oregon State v. California +10.5 | Top | 49-17 | Loss | -110 | 125 h 6 m | Show |
I'm playing on CALIFORNIA. Its definitely been a tough start to the season for the Bears. In fact, they've only got one SU win and have yet to cover the spread. I feel that they're offering excellent value here though and that this will be the week that they finally break through with at least a cover.
In addition to playing on the road for the second straight week, this will be the fourth time, in their past five games, that the Beavers have played away from home. They've got a huge game vs. Stanford on deck next week. I feel that it will be easy to look past lowly Cal here. That will prove costly as the Bears haven't forgotten that the Beavers embarrassed them last season, a 62-14 drubbing at Oregon State. They've had more success against the Beavers here at home though, most recently a 23-8 win in 2011. While the Beavers have been explosive offensively, the defense has been suspect. The Beavers are allowing more than 30 points and 400 yards per game. On the road, the Beavers are allowing 34 points and 415 yards. That make covering double-digits tough. While the Bears have admittedly had defensive issues of their own, Cal can also move the ball. Indeed, the Bears are averaging a whopping 563 yards in their four games. While that's translated to "only" 30.7 points per game, it easily could have been more. The Bears are 6-3 the last nine times that they were listed as home underdogs in the 10.5 to 14 range. During that time, the Beavers were 1-2 ATS as road favorites in the 10.5 to 14 range. I believe the Bears are going to play with a chip on their shoulder and I expect them to score enough points to earn AT LEAST the cover. 10* |
|||||||
10-19-13 | Florida State v. Clemson +3 | Top | 51-14 | Loss | -110 | 123 h 8 m | Show |
I'm playing on CLEMSON. Needless to say, this is a huge game for both teams. With it being played at Death Valley, I favor the home underdog.
I successfully played against the Tigers at Boston College last week. They needed to rally to win the game. I believe that result has worked in our favor here. The Tigers got their wake-up call last week - lets not forget that Boston College also gave the Seminoles a bit of a scare. (I also had BC in that one.) The fact that they were able to rally for the win should give them confidence and momentum here, while also some valuable close game experience. Additionally, as the perception is that they barely won last week - while FSU had a bye preceded by a 63-0 win - we're getting the Tigers as an underdog. Clemson defensive end Vic Beasley, who already has nine sacks, had this to say: ''Last year they got us, but I feel like we should have won. We're looking for payback.'' The Tigers, who beat FSU here in 2011 and who have long had ATS success as a host in this series, have been excellent in conference play the past few seasons, going a profitable 15-5-1 ATS. I'll take the points, but expect them to rise to the occasion with the outright win. 10* |
|||||||
10-19-13 | Wisconsin v. Illinois +10.5 | Top | 56-32 | Loss | -110 | 123 h 34 m | Show |
I'm playing on ILLINOIS. I won with the Badgers in their last game, a 35-6 blowout of Northwestern. I also won by going against the Illini in their last game, a 39-19 loss against Nebraska, two weeks ago. This time, however, I feel the value lies with the Illini, particularly after some line movement in their favor.
The Illini were on the road when they lost to Nebraska. They're back home now and they've had an extra week to prepare and recover. Note that the Illini are 3-0 in true home games, outscoring visiting teams by a 45.7 to 21.7 margin. The Nebraska loss notwithstanding, this is a much improved team from the one which lost by 17 AT Wisconsin last year, while listed as 14.5 point underdogs. Also, note that the Illini are already 1-0 SU/ATS off a bye this season. While the competition (obviously) wasn't nearly what they'll face here, the Illini were outstanding that game, beating Miami Ohio by a 50-14 margin. I backed the Illini in that game and they rewarded me by putting up more than 600 yards of offense, limiting the RedHawks to 250. While they've faced a pair of tough opponents - and while they didn't get any help from the refs out West - the Badgers are still 0-2 SU on the road. Now, they're being asked to lay double-digits away from home. Note that the Badgers, who were underdogs for each of their first two games, are 2-5 ATS the last seven times that they were listed as road favorites. While the Badgers are indeed tough to stop, note the Illini are expected to get 6-foot-3, 290-pound defensive tackle Teko Powell back. As defensive coordinator Tim Banks mentioned, he's athletic enough (and big enough) to help against the pass and the run. I expect the Illini to score points, enough of them to earn AT LEAST the cover. 10* |
|||||||
10-19-13 | UCLA v. Stanford -4 | Top | 10-24 | Win | 100 | 104 h 1 m | Show |
I'm playing on STANFORD. The Bruins check with the better record and the higher overall ranking. However, I believe that the Cardinal are favored for good reason.
The Cardinal appeared headed for a showdown with Oregon, thinking if they could win that game that they'd have the inside track for the National Championship game. Those plans took a major hit with last week's loss vs. Utah. Still, I believe that Stanford can and will handle its disappointment and bounce back with a much needed victory. With a game vs. Oregon on deck, its now UCLA which is starting to entertain National Title dreams. The Cardinal have won all three meetings the past couple of seasons, covering the spread in two of those. The Cardinal are in one of their better roles here. They're 3-0 ATS the last three times that they were listed as home favorites in the 3.5 to 7 range. If UCLA can beat Utah and Utah can beat Stanford, then UCLA must be able to beat Stanford. Right? Not in my opinion. I still believe the Cardinal are the stronger team and I look for them to show it on Saturday afternoon. 10* |
|||||||
10-18-13 | Central Florida +14.5 v. Louisville | Top | 38-35 | Win | 100 | 13 h 39 m | Show |
I'm playing on CENTRAL FLORIDA. This line has climbed considerably from its opener. While I already really liked the Knights, I now believe that we're also getting very good line value.
Louisville is indeed a very strong team, on both sides of the ball. The Cardinals check in with a perfect 6-0 record. They've defeated every opponent by a minimum of 14 points and are winning their games by an average score of 41 to 7.3. While those are certainly impressive numbers, I believe that Central Florida is by far the best team that the Cards will have faced. The Knights are 4-1 on the season, including a victory at Penn State. That 34-31 victory, part of their 3-0 road record, was arguably more impressive than anything Louisville has yet to accomplish. The Knights lone loss on the season came at home - and by only a field goal - against a talented South Carolina team. In going 3-0 on the road, the Knights have outscored their hosts by an average score of 32-16. For the season, UCF is averaging 414 yards per game, 6.5 yards per play. The defense is permitting just 16.6 ppg, 353 ypg. The Nittany Lions were the only team to score more than 30 points against them - and they got just 31. Bridgewater has proven to be a very capable QB for the Cards. However, he wasn't all that sharp last time out. While not nearly as well known, UCF has a capable QB of its own. Blake Bortles has completed nearly 65 percent of his passes for 1,334 yards and nine touchdowns. While the Knights are off a bye, the Cards are playing their third game in the past 13 days. The Knights have been excellent as road underdogs in this range over the years and I look for them to prove a much tougher test for the Cards than many will be expecting. 10* |
|||||||
10-17-13 | Miami (Florida) v. North Carolina +9.5 | Top | 27-23 | Win | 100 | 12 h 31 m | Show |
I'm playing on NORTH CAROLINA. I've liked UNC all week, liking the Tar Heels at +7 or better. However, I waited until Wednesday to release the play, as I'd hoped the number might climb all the way to (or past) +10. When it looked like it wouldn't get there, II decided to jump in at +9.5. Frankly, I won't be shocked if UNC scores the outright win.
Back in the top 10 for the first time in a few years and facing a struggling UNC squad, I believe that the Hurricanes could easily get caught patting themselves on the back. While the Hurricanes are always loaded with talent and very athletic, I'm not convinced that this year's team has done enough (yet) to deserve its lofty ranking. Sure, they beat G-Tech last game. That was at home though - and they had to overcome a 10-point deficit. The Canes win over Florida, while impressive, also came at home - and it came by only five points. The Canes only road game was at South Florida. So, not only were they within their own state, they were also facing a Bulls team which has been terrible this season. Granted, the Tar Heels haven't been too good either. In fairness, however, three of their five games have been on the road - and those games were at South Carolina, Georgia Tech and Virginia Tech - none of them easy venues. They had one disappointing home loss (ECU) but won their other home game (MTSU) by double-digits. While its been a tough start, a win here would change everything for the Heels. Not only would they gain respect from the National TV audience, they'd put themselves back in position to reach a bowl. (After this, the schedule gets considerably easier.) The Heels upset the Canes last season, at Miami. That should give them some confidence here that they can do it again. Miami QB Morris struggled, going 12 of 26 for 155 yards with two INTs, before exiting late due to an ankle injury. The Canes won here in 2011 but it was only by six points. Prior to that, the Heels had beaten them four straight here. UNC's coach Larry Fedora said this, when asked if the season was salvageable: "There is no doubt in my mind that it is and it starts today, or yesterday or whenever you want it to start, it starts now |
|||||||
10-14-13 | Indianapolis Colts v. San Diego Chargers +2 | Top | 9-19 | Win | 100 | 38 h 14 m | Show |
I'm playing on SAN DIEGO. I successfully played against the Chargers last week. However, that was on the road and they were laying a handful of points. That's not the case here. They're at home and aren't being asked to win by any extra margin. I feel that they're providing us with fair value.
Give the Colts credit for a big win over the Seahawks last week. However, that was at home. Now, they're out West, thousands of miles away. They've also got a Sunday night showdown vs. Peyton Manning, their former leader, on deck. If there's ever a game to get caught looking ahead to, that figures to be it. (*The Chargers have Jacksonville on deck, so no reason for them to look ahead.) The Colts could easily be caught patting themselves on the back a little, too. Note that this is the Colts third road game in the past four weeks - the second time that they've had to come out West, during that span. The Chargers did lose at Oakland last week. However, they had a 423-299 edge in total yards. On the other hand, the Colts were out gained by more than 100 yards in their win. The Chargers, who have had remarkable success vs. AFC South teams over the years, are 8-2 SU/ATS the last 10 times that they played a home game with an O/U line of greater than 49. I look for home field to prove significant, the Chargers emerging victorious. 10* |